English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-25 16:10:08 · 11 answers · asked by ? 5 in Pets Dogs

I guess we all love animals too much to even play around with the idea of messing with them...
sorry I asked!

2006-07-25 16:22:21 · update #1

11 answers

Naw, I prefer the tail.

2006-07-25 17:13:40 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

Uh... no. Especially considering that I'll never get a dog that was born with a carrying handle in his back.

2006-07-25 16:18:19 · answer #2 · answered by ATWolf 5 · 0 0

You ever try picking up a 215lb Mastiff?...I didn't think so. Stop watching the Sci-Fi channel Dude.

2006-07-25 16:19:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, I would. My pug is a little heavy, but hey it'd give me nice arm muscles.

2006-07-25 17:06:54 · answer #4 · answered by Lindsay M 5 · 0 0

Even I wouldnt talk about you're wife like that.

2006-07-25 16:14:35 · answer #5 · answered by jokedrugs 4 · 0 0

In the long run, you would have a "Hunched back dog".

2006-07-25 16:14:55 · answer #6 · answered by ricardocoav 4 · 0 0

Are you serious? Have you been reading a new book on evolution?

2006-07-25 16:13:50 · answer #7 · answered by Sammyleggs222 6 · 0 0

Never thought about this and perhaps you shouldn't either.

2006-07-25 16:20:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why would I do that, he has legs let him walk

2006-07-25 16:18:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont think he would be born w/ one. but i DO think u r WIERD!

2006-07-25 16:13:51 · answer #10 · answered by dani k 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers