Is there any actual science involved in "creation science"?

Question

Maybe I should have started with, do you know what science is?

Ok, as of the time of this edit, "Zoril" has the prize for dumbest answer. If you cannot answer intelligently, maybe you can beat Zoril out for Top Idiot.

Wow, "Rick B" is really giving Zoril a run for the money here!

Actually, its not very nice of me to pick on Zoril and Rick B. I forget that this is an all-ages site and so if you're not yet in high school, Z and RB, I'm sorry, hopefully your school will teach you something someday. If you are adults, then you should be ashamed of yourselves.

Answer 1

No. Science requires a theory to be tested and the ability to independently corroborate findings by repetition of any tests. Anecdotal evidence from a single source does not meet this criterion Obviously, "creation science" cannot meet these basic scientific standards.

Answer 2

Many well educated creationists ask the same of Evolution Science. It takes patience and a truly objective frame of mind to educate yourself and truly hear the arguements of Creation Science, but after they are all objectively heard and put together in a logical arguement, I find many evolutionists begin to second guess the Evolution education they have been bombarded with since childhood.

The Evolution theory is riddled with holes that are not mentioned in our upbringing.

This site is a fantastic starting resource to learn some of the deeper details of the Creation Theory. There is a wealth of great information out there just as accurate and believable as Evolution science. Objectivity must just be the rule as you observe and learn:

http://www.evolution.no-ip.net
It does take

Answer 3

Yes, there is also actual science behind the church of the flying spagettii monster which uses the exact same arguments of creation science to proove that the universe was in fact created by a giant spagetti monster. http://www.venganza.org/

Now about the whole creation bit, who created the creator? Saying the creator has always been or that the creator created itself does not make the universe any simpler. The argument behind creationism is that the universe is to complex just to have come into existance by itself but is not a creator coming into existance (by any means) just as complex?

Answer 4

Not by my way of thinking. [According to the nuns at my grade school] God created the heavens and the earth, all the living things ON the earth as well as Adam and Eve in a matter of 6 days and He rested on the 7th. Doesn't seem like there would be enough time for science to have kicked in in the short amount of time.

FYI: I'm torn between my faith and logic-not sure HOW we all got here to this point.

Answer 5

Well let's see..........Yep. Otherwise science would not be there. Many, many things have pointed to a creator. Like even the most basic of animals, the single celled ameoba, is far too complex for chance to have evolved it. And many other things.

Besides the Bible says (can't find it at the moment) that all of creation points to a creator or God.

Answer 6

God created the world, and the universe and that is that.

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

Answer 7

Actually yes! If one studys biology and earth science and marine biology one can see the science in creation!

Answer 8

Check here:

http://www.godsci.org/

Answer 9

i doubt it, i dont think there is a way to test any hypothesis that can come from "creation science" so it cant be true science

Answer 10

Actually yes...

though I am not a creation scientist...

Cordially,
John