Well, I'm a liberal and I don't agree with that. I don't control what others believe so I can't speak for them. I don't agree with abortions being performed without parental consent. Believe it or not, all liberals don't think exactly alike, just like all conservatives don't.
2006-07-25 14:05:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by First Lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
interior the united kingdom once you're 18 you may supply or refuse consent for any treatment on your own actual. Your moms and dads don't have any say. if you're less than 18 you may supply or refuse consent if you're "Gillick useful". which means you're able to comprehend-how the topic matters and disadvantages in contact and function the adulthood to make the alternative. 16 and 17 twelve months olds are presumed Gillick useful until eventually there is information on the opposite, yet a baby of any age might want to be deemed useful. If consent is given a ensure can not overrule the youngster. yet a baby's refusal to consent might want to be overruled by using the ensure. in spite of everything, newborn or man or woman, professional ethics ability treatment and surgical procedure ought to purely be performed the position it truly is medically needed. until eventually you've a severe condition I strongly doubt that you want a hysterectomy and a mastectomy so consent is way less appropriate than really want. in case you want a sex replace or similar, you want to undergo a lengthy sequence of psychological tests to easily remember to are actual. those might want to easily about honestly require you to be elderly over 18.
2016-11-26 00:00:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the child and the situation. If a child is being abused at home or will be battered senseless (and I mean, really beaten) for being pregnant and it is in their best interests to keep their planned abortion from their parents then that is what must be done.
2006-07-25 14:24:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by starchilde5 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Parents must maintain the parental rights of their children.
No, no government, should have the authority over kids and what decisions must be made for them as long as they have a mother and father or just one parent.
2006-07-25 14:08:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do republicans:
start unneccessary wars
and make the deficit then let it skyrocket
and give to the rich
and take from the poor
and let whole cities get buried under water
and not fund stem cell research but kill innocent, actually living humans?
and on.... and on.... and on... and on...
think about it.
2006-07-25 16:03:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Queen D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
um... i read the link... they PASSED a bill making it ILLEGAL to take a child over the state line in order to keep the abortion from the parents... that's what I READ.
2006-07-25 14:12:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by JayneDoe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it tears down moral standards and America, they're for it.
2006-07-25 14:07:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why don't you just say abortion? Why did you hid your question in another question?
2006-07-25 14:07:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by steveed 3
·
0⤊
0⤋