2006-07-25 13:18:18 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It is wonderful to dive into the unknown but recognising ones limitations is the best way to proceed. Enjoy the Messiah and think less about the antichrist.
2006-07-25 13:27:57 · answer #1 · answered by Tommy M 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I hope so. Let's get the show on the road!
All kidding aside, it would be very difficult to tell the Christ from the AntiChrist because the majority of the Christian religion has drifted over to the modern-day equivalent of the Pharisees. So, the majority of Christians might falsely accuse Christ of being the AntiChrist, since Christ would not be aligned with the main stream status quo churches.
2006-07-25 20:26:08 · answer #2 · answered by Skeptimystic 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 John 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
1 John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
2 John 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
2006-07-25 20:25:07 · answer #3 · answered by Carol M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The one referred to in Revelations? Yes. "The Apocolypse of John" (we call Revelations) is classic Greco/Jewish Apocolyptic literature. Even St. Augustine and others, who permitted it in the Bible, knew it was a forgery (not written by John the Elder). It references (by number) the Roman Emperor of the time. The "whore of babylon" was the common epiteth used by early Christians to represent Rome.
Read as a historical text, there's no question it refers to the troubles of the day (under Roman persecution) and promises divine relief.
So, yes. He has been born. He was born when the book was written. Trouble is, the book is a myth/political statement for a time that is nearly 2,000 years past... You're looking for a guy who is already dead, along with the empire he ruled.
2006-07-25 20:29:21 · answer #4 · answered by antirion 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, she was. She was born on April 10, 1979 in Fort Worth, Texas, at around 12:15 local time.
2006-07-25 20:23:59 · answer #5 · answered by imagineworldwide 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anti-christ is anything against the teachings of christ. There are many Anti-christ, as for the beast in the bible 666 the number of a man. Well I would say he is here, using his words to glorify himself, a person of power and wealth. the beast is a slick person they do not even know they are the beast of the bible.
2006-07-25 20:25:57 · answer #6 · answered by Brother John 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Anit-Christ will NOT be born, he descends to earth when thrown out of heaven
He is Satan the Devil The fallen angle Death The son of perdition
2006-07-25 20:35:41 · answer #7 · answered by Grandreal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BABY THE ANTI-CHRIST HAS ALREADY BEEN SPAWNED.. .HE WAS BORN WHEN GOD CREATED HIM HE WAS THE ANGEL OF MUSIC IN HEAVEN. HE WAS CAST OUT OF HEAVEN ALONG WITH 1/3 O HEAVEN ONTO EARTH... SO SIN AND EVIL AND PAIN IS ALREADY HERE!
BUT HE WILL BE UNLEASEHD NOT born... WHEN THE RAPTURE OCCURS
2006-07-25 20:23:50 · answer #8 · answered by Justice A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if the anti-christ was already born believe me...you would know
2006-07-25 20:23:22 · answer #9 · answered by since feeling is first... 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe so, but explaining why I believe that we're in the end of this age would take too long.
There's alot of interesting material on this website to explain endtime prophesy, especially the videos called
Understanding the Endtime.
2006-07-25 20:23:06 · answer #10 · answered by Acts 2 38 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋