English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As Ms. Rice spoke of an urgent and enduring peace out of the other side of her mouth she helped ensure the quick delivery of US "Bunker Busters" and negotiated the postponement of any peace talks. Indigenous communities and people of color all over the world and through out time are well acquainted with ethnic hatred and the actions such double talk seek to cover up or sanitize.

Since the dawn of humanity nationalistic elitist cliques have sought the destruction of other ethnic groups. Throughout the writings of the ancient Greeks are reports of genocide-like massacres ..... which continue through the Middle Ages. European elites sought the complete extermination of our Indigenous First Nation populations here in the Western Hemisphere. In Australia, Africa, and elsewhere other indigenous populations were sometimes slated for elimination by their white "discovers" or invaders. Ethnic massacres still flourish on into the twenty-first century.

The first great genocide of our current era date back to the white-man’s hatred of America’s First Nations. The First World War saw hundreds of thousands of Armenians destroyed and for the first time such killings were called a "crime against humanity." In the Second World War, Churchill called it "a crime without a name," as Hitler undertook what he called the "final solution," reminding his generals that "nobody remembers the Armenians.".

2006-07-25 10:34:12 · 13 answers · asked by rcabrave 2 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

I in no way wish harm to Israel or her people and strongly believe that they should defend themselves and needed to address the frightening buildup of missles on their northern border.

Under new political leadership they have allowed a new tact to be taken ...one whose short-sightedness has lost them the moral high ground. They should have learned from all the lost chances and abyssmal mistakes the neo-cons made for the USA. But they will for decades have to live with the consequences of their destroying a pro-western secular state and creating another Iraq.

My question was directed at Rice's hypocritic postering in acting she is for peace while delivering bunker busters that with hard target smart fuzes can penetrate 100 feet of earth or 20 feet of concrete and can be tipped with mini nukes or depleted uranium. Israel may want to exterminate a party and an ideal and creating a radioactive graveyard I guess is one way of achieving an enduring peace ... the peace of the dead.

2006-07-26 06:50:33 · update #1

13 answers

History repeats itself!! That's because no one ever learned a damn thing from it!

My sense from Ms Rice they weren't going to stop until Hezbollah was terminated! Who knows, Iran seems to be next on the list! Where has Korea been lately??

At least all of the BS over the past few months is keeping Iraq and the 2, 796 dead that we have off the front page!

Any one seen Osama?? I think I saw him on the L a few days ago!

2006-07-25 10:45:27 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 3

So you are saying she wants the final solution AKA KILL ALL THE JEWS? I have a hard time believing that she would deliver "bunker busters" to the Hezbollah (or however you spell it). So the Jews could be wiped off the face of the planet. Israel would not need to purchase bunker busters as they can make their own. The United States and this administration are friends of Israel. They are the only civilized nation in that part of the world.

2006-07-25 10:52:52 · answer #2 · answered by cashcobra_99 5 · 0 0

ms Rice is a part of the postponement of any solution and all the double talk that is going on is not the truth the real mastermined plan has been building for a while within the whitehouse and through the media

2006-07-25 11:06:45 · answer #3 · answered by de-light1 2 · 0 0

So does the fact Ms. Rice, an American of colour, now fall into a category of ethnic cleansing when she (Bush) wants a solution for peace?
Is your question a philosophy or a complaint?

2006-07-25 12:28:50 · answer #4 · answered by beedaduck 3 · 0 0

I see you read, ty. We have Many in our country who are just plain too stupid to grasp even simple things. They think this is a war on Terrorism. It is no such thing. Many followed Hitler blindly to their death and those that are spoon fed by Rush and FOX will never get it. A terrorist is a terrorist because he will not fight any of our Marines face to face, they do the dirty work behind your back.
Bush and his cronies will never get it. A terrorist would not even face the average American in a face to face fight, they are cowards, Much like Bush and Cheney who are both draft dodgers.

2006-07-25 13:00:57 · answer #5 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0 0

What? Did you put your class to sleep with this lecture? America isn't going into the genocide business any time soon. The trouble makers will have plenty of time to skedaddle on their own. In fact they are already trying to run and hide amongst those fleeing. The girls that they are.

2006-07-25 10:40:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Rather that she stayed home,or do you want her to pull the Israeli's off the terrorist? She should let the Israeli's finish off Hezbollah then Syria and Iran.That will ensure a true peace.

2006-07-25 10:37:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Obviously a man that spends his time in Academia, and not the real world.

What part of Hezbollah's stated goal of KILLING ALL JEWS do you not understand?

And why is it that so many of you "educated" want the terrorists to be victorious? You realize they wouldnt hesitate to kill you too, right?

2006-07-26 04:31:32 · answer #8 · answered by clockwork_oranje2002 3 · 0 0

Got blog?

But to answer your question, no it doesn't sound at all like a "final solution". But Hezbollah is a terrorist organization and we are at war with terror, we are committed to the elimination of terrorists, we do not negotiate with them.

2006-07-25 10:40:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The only 'Final Solution' involved is Hezbollah's stated desire to 'drive Israel into the sea'. They define cease-fire as 'time to re-arm'.

2006-07-25 13:32:15 · answer #10 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers