Oh I totally aggree with you..it's those PETA freaks! I love animals and all and hate to see them hurt but come on..they ARE just animals!
2006-07-25 07:01:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Courtney L 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Good grief, you ask some really strange stuff. Or at least it seems strange when it's out of context.
Are you talking about a specific situation in which it was a kid's life OR a puppy's life, and people chose the puppy?
Or are you just angry that Yahoo took down all of your questions about the "best" ways to violently dispatch animals, and some of those same people who objected to those questions are pro-choice (see, no one wants to see little kids die, but most people don't believe that embryos are little kids)?
2006-07-25 16:53:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cyn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be a shame to see either die, but if it came down to saving a child's life or a pups life, it would have to be the child that got saved. Whoever you are referring to is one sick person if they would save a puppy over a child. They need professional help, and I hope to god they never have children. Just because 1 person is a WACKO doesn't mean the rest of us are.
2006-07-25 14:04:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by venus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My guess is the person who would save the puppy doesn't have children of their own. I would certainly hate to see anything happen to the puppy, but I couldn't imagine leaving a child behind on purpose!!
2006-07-25 16:04:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mandy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it is that we would rather see a small child over a dog, it is just that it is something we see happening everyday on the news. We don't de-value life we are just de-sensitized from it.
2006-07-25 15:55:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by jeannie_brim 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who are you talking about??? Lemme know so I dont run into them with my kids! Id run over any animal any day of the week to prevent a small child from being hurt or killed.
2006-07-25 14:00:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Angel Eve 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well they have to see that yes puppies are cute and bring you happiness but a child is more valuable. i take both equally i love dogs and hate to see them die but a child's life IS more valuable. and every one has thier own opinion no one needs any help!
2006-07-25 14:25:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by shalynnmoro 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Children definetly deserrve life over a dog...yes its not good but dammm....people are way more important than a stupid little dog..a person can change the world...a dog cant. can u give a link of people saying that?Peace out
2006-07-25 14:03:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats cruel Children should have great lives. But sadly it's hard to pick but I would say puppy
2006-07-25 14:00:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by brewers_babe49 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you had a choice, do you save your siblings life from a burning building? or you puppy? you can't have both, choose one.
Your answer to that question is the reason why.
2006-07-25 14:15:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by mahjongdong 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
not me an animal or a human life is precious. why should anyone have to die. i have kids and a dog and wouldnt want any of them to het hurt.
2006-07-25 14:02:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by ♥BUD or BUD LIGHT♥ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋