Yes, of course. Such proof doesn't exist though, which is why I don't.
2006-07-25 06:12:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by lenny 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The only indisputable proof for me would be to see heaven or hell with my own eyes while I am still living. I died when I was 22 and did have an out of body experience. Lots of birght lights and all. But saw no friends or family who had "passed over". Watched from above as the medical staff worked to bring me back. They finally jump-started my heart. I was a non-believer since age 8. This episode only solidified my feelings that this life is all we have. Therefore we need to live our best and take care of each other and our environment while we are here.
2006-07-25 06:20:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there was indisputable proof, more than just having a "belief", I'd have knowledge, so, I'd "believe" in Jesus teachings. That's why christianity is all about "faith", there is no proof for the supernatural claims.
That's what it is all about for me, to have proof, I haven't got any for heaven, hell or the divinity of Jesus though.
2006-07-25 06:27:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Oedipus Schmoedipus 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's quite a hypothetical. If there were indisputable proof then I'd believe. If there was a great deal of proof I'd tend to believe. If there were more proof for than to the contrary then I might believe. But as it stands, there's almost no evidence that there are any gods, let alone any particular god.
Still, I'll continue listening to people's attempts to prove it. Unlike, say, Fundamentalists and science I will accept the objective evidence if it's there. I won't refuse to believe no matter what the evidence.
2006-07-25 06:16:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by thatguyjoe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry the question as stated can not be answered.
I already believe in Jesus, but I don't believe that there's a heaven and hell and Jesus is the only way to heaven.
This idea takes the teachings of Jesus to places He never intended for it to go.
It scrambles his true teachings and reduces them by several orders of relevance and puts nonsense in place of them.
Stop listening to what other people are telling you about God and Jesus, and read your New Testament your self in the proper context.
Love and blessings
don
2006-07-25 06:21:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you explain why it is that all the Jews around at Jesus time didn't drop their faith and convert to Christianity? Scripturally Jesus is yet another FALSE Messiah (yeah, he met 80-90 percent of the criteria...not enough though). If he had in fact been the Messiah than you and I wouldn't be here to discuss this as humanity would have ascended or descended upon his death on the Cross or at his resurrection. Why do you suppose the Jews are called the "chosen people"? The Jews were chosen to be living pentance for the sins of humanity and that's why to this day they've been persecuted and reviled. PEACE!
2006-07-25 06:18:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by thebigm57 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there were indisputable proof that there was no Jesus, Heaven, or Hell... would you believe?
2006-07-25 06:15:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Eldritch 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Indisputable proof that ANYONE is the only way to heaven would result in many believing.
Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on one's perspective, there is no indisputable proof (or even significant evidence) that Issa/Yuz Asaf/Jesus is the only way to heaven.
2006-07-25 06:58:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by solistavadar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The indisputable proof is when you learn the ten commandments and find out how evil you are. Your understanding is then at odds with your will. Then you confess your a sinner before Jesus Christ and repent.
http://www.mechanicsburgnewchurch.org
2006-07-25 06:13:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe without physical proof, but I feel like proof of God's existence is everywhere through the design of the universe and the miracles that happen everyday. Besides, many people have visited Heaven and they see the same place and God.
2006-07-25 06:13:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by philhanan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who would disbelieve that for which there exists indisputable proof. On the other hand, who would believe that for which the evidence against is overwhelming. Works both ways.
2006-07-25 06:16:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by bonzo the tap dancing chimp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋