i sure do hope so then they could get a taste of what we go threw lol
2006-07-25 05:50:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by jackie2y2 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
in order for a mammal to birth children, they must have a Uterus or some other formation which both allows for a fetus to grow, and has tubes/veins/arteries/etc that allows for gas exchange between the host and the child as well as blood exchange and nutritional exchange.
Scientifically speaking, Men would need a uterus or some other type of birthing sac to contain the child and they would also need a vagina of sorts in order to push the newborn out. The Anus would nver be able to stand up to this pressure and stretching damage.
this prototype male would also need Ovaries and fallopian tubes or some way of producing human eggs that would then be fertilized by a sperm cell of some kind.
Science could posossibly create a human that looks like a man and has the sexual organs of a female, We allready know the natural form of this organism as a hermaphrodite, however, hermaphrodites are typically sterile.
Basically, this type of science could be done using gene therapy, all you'd end up with is a Man who has the exact same sex organs as a female.
In gender classification terms, you would call this new man a WOMAN - simply because he has female sex organs. That is unless you created a new term for it. Perhaps you could call this person "OTHER" .
This type of science is related to Invitro fertilization which is a type of artificially gestated human.
2006-07-25 12:59:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Undoubtedly, but I don't know why they would. I can't imagine there would be much demand for such a thing. If we find an easy and effective way to gestate a child outside of the female body - like in a laboratory - there would be no reason to then implant such a child in a man. I guess there might be a small number of men who would want to experience pregnancy but the research and the procedure itself would like be much too cost prohibitive to develop for such a small market.
I suppose you might desire this as a way of evening the score for the admittedly unfair biological burden placed on women, but let's take that road one step at a time. Personally I'd rather see them hurry up and finish testing the male birth control pill. Now there's a responsibility many men are eager to share.
2006-07-25 12:55:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by du_robot 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm fix us? Since when are we broken?
Like another guy said to another question... the day science can make us having babies is the day guys everywhere stand up and say, "No more babies."
Yeah OK... squeezing something the size of a watermelon out of something the size of a lemon is bad... but a watermelon through a slit the size of a pea?! Nnnnno!
2006-07-25 12:52:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, and I certainly hope they wouldn't try.
You probably don't want my opinion, but I can't help it!
In my opinion, science is going way too far and not thinking about the consequences of their actions. Cloning....not right, cell stem research.....kinda sad. And now you can have surgery control machines by thought.....scary. I think that if they continue like this, things will change severely and we will be in trouble.....big trouble! ahhh, oh no! But yeah, I'm not a big fan of science. I know they have people's best interests in mind (sometimes), but I still think it's some of the things they do should only be done by God.
God bless!
=D
2006-07-25 12:55:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Scoot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As I understand, they could sustain a fetus for some time in their body cavity, as the embryo will attach to something and take things from there. Obviously it would run out or room and nutrition after a point, by in theory, it's possible.
2006-07-25 12:50:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jester 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think that is a good idea. Guys just arent emotionally ready to be pregnant or able to deal with the pain of giving birth. I know guys are stupid, but give them a break they dont know any better.
2006-07-25 12:53:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by zorroinmybed 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure they will be able to do so in the future some time. Question is is this a good idea? ANyone seen that arnold movie?
2006-07-25 12:54:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by GutsiePerson 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really hope not. I think if that does happen the amount of sex going on around the world will suddenly be reduced.
2006-07-25 12:52:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really hope not! They have a hard enough time taking care of themselves, finding clean underwear, and not destorying the kitchen in their attempts to cook.
2006-07-25 12:52:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Funchy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope not - guys could never deal with the pain of pregnancies! And they think we wine
2006-07-25 12:54:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Nina J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋