English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-25 00:31:35 · 5 answers · asked by michinoku2001 7 in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

No

2006-07-25 01:16:23 · answer #1 · answered by erik c 3 · 0 0

No, at this point they would just get in the way of both sides. Wait a while, then maybe put troops between the border but that is all.

2006-07-25 00:35:23 · answer #2 · answered by redhotboxsoxfan 6 · 0 0

NATO is taking care of Russia, its hands are full at the moment. And they have certain US influence too, so forget about this fantasy.

2006-07-25 00:35:49 · answer #3 · answered by Joy RP 4 · 0 0

NO...NATO SHOULD NOT BE DISPATCHED TO LEBANON...IT WILL GO AGAINST PALESTINE... THERE SHOULD BE A LARGER INTERNATION FORCE IN LEBANON TO SECURE ISRAEL FROM HIZBULLAH...AND IT WOULD BE MORE ACCEPTABLE TO THE ARAB WORLD ALSO.

2006-07-25 01:14:38 · answer #4 · answered by Marcos 4 · 0 0

Not yet.

2006-07-25 00:34:36 · answer #5 · answered by Puppy Zwolle 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers