English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

begin-and that is what happened so many eons ago that when man was here orbiting the sun on Venus (in the orbit that the Earth now has) he sent man to Earth which was where Mars is now and he did not return-and as the Suns Gravity pulls the planets closer to it each year-eventually Mars will be in Earths orbit and once it reaches the tempretures to sustain life the process will begin again-I'm Crazy you say-well until we send an observer to Venus to scan the planet there-and find the remnants of life that was once there I only have a Theory-but like I can not prove there is no God you can not prove my concept is incorrect. As Mercury gets closer to the sun it will go into rapid orbits and then be thrown out like a comet-Ever see a marble drop into water and a perfect bead-appears above the water? Imagine if you will a meteor striking the Earth and at such a magnitude that the Earth is liquified and that perfect bead is OUR MOON-which has lots of strikes-craters-that were here B4 Jesus!

2006-07-24 15:10:44 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

Again, like a moth drawn to the flame, I really try to comprehend your convoluted arguments, but soon my eyes start to glaze over. Your technique of throw enough manure at the wall and hope something sticks grows rather weary some. Just for your info, I have included a piece concerning the young age of Venus:

Mountains of Venus

Venus must have a strong crust to support its extremely high, densea mountains. One mountain, Maat Mons, rises higher than Earth’s Mount Everest does above sea level. Because Venus is relatively near the Sun, its atmosphere is 860°F—so hot its surface rocks must be weak or “tarlike.” (Lead melts at 622°F and zinc at 787°F.) Only if Venus’ subsurface rocks are cold and strong can its mountains defy gravity. This allows us to draw two conclusions, both of which contradict major evolutionary assumptions.

First, evolutionists assume planets grew (evolved) by the gradual accumulation of rocky debris falling in from outer space, a process called gravitational accretion. Heat generated by a planet’s worth of impacts would have left the rocky planets molten. However, Venus was never molten. Had it been, its hot atmosphere would have prevented its subsurface rocks from cooling enough to support its mountains. So Venus did not evolve by gravitational accretion.

Secondly, evolutionists believe the entire solar system is billions of years old. If Venus were billions of years old, its atmospheric heat would have “soaked” deeply enough into the planet to weaken its subsurface rocks. If so, not only could Venus’ crust not support mountains, the hot mountains themselves could not maintain their steep slopes. Venus must be relatively young.

And I have plenty more like this if you wish more education.

2006-07-24 15:32:10 · answer #1 · answered by BrotherMichael 6 · 2 0

it might very much count on the direction of the physique. it is maximum in all probability that it might freeze initially as for the main area area is rather chilly and a human physique is made up quite often of water. If the direction took the physique on the factor of the sunlight or yet another massive call then the ice would start to soften or maybe in step with probability deplete. there may well be slightly decomposition interior the corpse if there have been suffiecient bacteria recent yet there would be no oxidation because of fact the suroundings would lack the neccisary gases to reason this. on the different hand the physique would take a direction finest it rapidly interior the deep area the place it might stay frozen until it the two (a) grew to alter into drawn to a much off massive call; or (b) colided with a stable merchandise.

2016-12-10 14:59:34 · answer #2 · answered by holness 4 · 0 0

Whether the orbit of a body decays over time is determined by the possibility that the body will encounter atmosphere.

Your theory on the deterioration of an orbit is not supported by the scientific community.

There are craters on earth - you just can't see them very well because most of the surface is water, covered with foliage, and subject to erosion. The moon has none of that, so craters are more defined.

Still, there are plenty of craters on earth. Here's one in AZ: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~ken/crater.jpg

2006-07-24 15:21:51 · answer #3 · answered by © 2007. Sammy Z. 6 · 0 0

I was going to comment on what an interesting question this one is.
Then it got wordy and complicated so I'll pass.

2006-07-24 15:17:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that is one huge block of text. quit intemidating. my answer would be ... yes?

2006-07-24 15:16:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers