Millions of Americans are without healthcare coverage and nationalized healthcare is the only foreseeable solution.
2006-07-24 12:31:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Taxes ➔ United States
STEVEN F: I agree a government run healthcare system would be of a lower standard than a privately run sector. But, what's the better option for someone with no insurance: lower but still decent quality healthcare of no health care at all?
2006-07-24 14:31:49 · update #1
Yes, I would. I'm paying through the nose now for the insurance I have on myself and my family. It is a real shame that the United States is supposedly the most advanced nation in the world and we have hard working families who can't afford healthcare. It makes me REALLY mad that every prisoner in our prison system has the best of health and dental care at the expense of these hard working families.
2006-07-24 12:46:00 · answer #1 · answered by starrynight1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
each and every person will pay one way or yet another. the U. S. authorities will pay for each thing out of our taxes. it is the #a million source of the authorities's earnings. If Obama taxes the prosperous (which he's honestly one of) then they're going to pass that more effective tax onto their workers and consumers so as that the middle and reduce instructions will finally end up procuring those more effective taxes. i comprehend, i'm a employer proprietor and that is precisely what i will earnings this interior the destiny, the poor will be procuring their own health care even with the very incontrovertible certainty that they gained't imagine they're. it truly is the reason Obama should not be elected. i might want to offer a rat's butt about Obama's health care plan. My health care is thoroughly loose. by using human beings like John McCain i visit under no circumstances ought to pay a lame health care professional for his screw united statesEVER yet then no longer each and every person had the delight of their united states of america to hitch the protection rigidity. a pair of years out of my existence and that i'm getting loose health care until eventually eventually I die. Sucks to be poor. President McCain has already gained.
2016-11-25 22:09:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would.
I lived in England for awhile and it was amazing to me to be able to go to the hospital or dentist and get x-rays, surgery, etc and then just walk out the door at the end of it all. People pay WAY too much for insurance these days.
The English have it figured out... why can't we?
2006-07-24 17:26:29 · answer #3 · answered by Talamascaa 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Government interference is the main reason medical costs are as high as they are now. When has the government ever made anything more efficient? (Think DMV, IRS)
2006-07-24 14:04:00 · answer #4 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would... as it is my duty as an American who pays taxes to ensure the health of poor Americans... war machines vs. healthcare...hmmm let me think, let us all think
2006-07-24 12:35:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and lower or no health insurance. Overall it'd cost LESS!
2006-07-24 12:38:05 · answer #6 · answered by ranger beethoven 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no
look at Canada and their mess
2006-07-24 17:21:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO, IT IS ALSO NOT LAWFUL. TO EVEN TRY IT IN THIS COUNTRY.
2006-07-25 09:50:58 · answer #8 · answered by rhett_madison 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
2006-07-24 23:16:58 · answer #9 · answered by sahel578 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
2006-07-24 12:34:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋