2006-07-24 12:23:32 · 6 answers · asked by maryam 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Establishing democracy by invading a sovereign nation based on lies and deception could only be done democracy. The invasion of Iraq was wrong and the Iraqi exiles who are now the face of new so called democracy is actually the biggest joke to any intelligent person. The truth is that after three years US and its coaliation of greed (willing) had no control in any part of Iraq. They even cannot claim to have full control of 4 Square mile Green Zone. The new exiles puppets are scared to leave the Green Zone how could they claim to be the representatives of common Iraqis.
The US is not really interested in true democracy in Muslim countries because true democratic government will not support all their wrong policies. It is impossible to bring democracy with illegal invasion. The exiles puppet governemtn will run away as soon as US withdraw from Iraq.
LOL. Free people.... are you kidding me. Occupation and invasion is called slavery not Freedom.
2006-07-24 12:35:42 · answer #1 · answered by A K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't IMPOSE democracy through war, but you can allow the people you've released from a brutal and evil dictator to establish their own democracy.
War is neither democratic or non-democratic. War is used as the last resort to make a country, or a region, or the world safe from an evil, aggressive regime (or organization, these days).
The point of the war wasn't to force democracy. It was to get rid of the threat of Saddam Hussein. And you don't have to "impose" democracy on people. It's the natural state of human beings. When given a choice, people choose liberty and freedom every time.
2006-07-24 12:29:49 · answer #2 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we imposed democracy here by war. Sorry.
2006-07-24 12:27:49 · answer #3 · answered by RandyGE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, now that you element out it, it truly is marvelous. they protest war, yet deaths in all of u.s.'s wars combine falls short of three million, yet abortions in u.s. seeing that roe v. wade is round 40 9 million. why arnt they protesting the war humanity has waged antagonistic to the unborn? and your actual, the toddlers that arnt an "inconvenience" get the inconvenience of a mortgaged destiny. huh, i do not comprehend why, sorry i could not help.
2016-11-25 22:05:42 · answer #4 · answered by picou 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. But Saddam had to go. Afterwards it became a mess.
2006-07-24 12:25:30 · answer #5 · answered by A Person 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what do you propose, oh wise one?
2006-07-24 12:27:00 · answer #6 · answered by qt2sh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋