I'm fed up with Nero's clumsy interface and slow speeds.
2006-07-24 11:24:11 · 7 answers · asked by MvE 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Software
Also: why do you like your preferred program?
2006-07-24 11:31:28 · update #1
I'd rather know of alternatives to Nero, actually. I find it slow and not very user friendly. Not as much control as I'd like to have. It's too simplified and ends up pissing me off.
2006-07-25 02:55:26 · update #2
roxio is really good try that or the windows one but thats not very good but nti is a good one to try too
2006-07-24 11:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by Adam 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That i comprehend of... each and every of the DvD burning application is going to especially a lot tie up your pc until eventually it truly is performed... once you've a sturdy pc quickly with quite some reminiscence... and also you run different application even as you burn DvD's.. you're taking a probability of a speed mismatch.. and the DvD might want to no longer tutor maximum magnificent... some thing tying up the bus on the incorrect time.. may reason a difficulty.... often the burning application has numerous buffers to avert this sort of difficulty... yet they don't continually artwork... Nero does a sturdy pastime.. only make confident you burn DvD's at a time once you do not favor to apply the computer for different stuff.
2016-11-25 22:02:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nero
2006-07-24 11:28:15 · answer #3 · answered by Luay14 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe nero 6 with cd / dvd burner option when u have it fully installed it only takes up 35mb
2006-07-24 20:05:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nero is easy to use, maybe you have an outdated version?
2006-07-24 17:16:32 · answer #5 · answered by AnswerGuy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Windows media player
2006-07-24 11:27:09 · answer #6 · answered by Silly2002 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nero.
Roxio is close, but still 2nd, IMO
2006-07-24 11:27:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋