2006-07-24 11:17:38 · 12 answers · asked by Kenny ♣ 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Please note - the morning after pill is not the same as the abortion pill
2006-07-24 11:23:43 · update #1
I'm anti-religion and I'm pro the Morning After Pill.
It's not abortion, because the fertalized egg never attached to the uteran wall. It's like it was never there in the first place.
2006-07-24 11:22:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Birth control pills, if used correctly, prevent conception. If you miss a pill and take 2 the day after, it works kind of like the "morning after pill". The "morning after pill" or "plan B" actually just prevents the egg from attaching to the uterus. It is a really early abortion, drug-enduced.
I dont believe that premarital sex is correct. Responsible people, married or not, religious or not, will prevent conception or accept the result of their actions.
2006-07-24 18:24:31 · answer #2 · answered by Sara B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a Christian but I dont follow any organized religion but from my own beliefs I can say that for myself I do not believe in birth controll. I wont be having sex with anyone I dont want the mother of my children and if she doesnt want to BE the mother of my children, she better not have sex with me.
Overall, I dont condemn birth controll because I dont expect everyone to think like I do. I can accept the morning after pill in rape cases but Id hit the roof if any girl took one after sleeping with me.
2006-07-24 18:27:41 · answer #3 · answered by impossble_dream 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Natural Family Planning is the only acceptable form and yes I agree. The morning after is the same to us as abortion.
2006-07-24 18:21:02 · answer #4 · answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think such things are necessary to maintain a population, so it doesn't become over-populated. Atheism doesn't view neither of the two wrong and neither do I. I honestly think that sometimes it's better for some children to not enter this world, depending on who the parents would be. I don't think not just anyone should have a child, especially teenagers. It's sad to watch a child be abused or neglected, it breaks my heart. I wish all of those animal activists would care about children instead of animals.
2006-07-24 19:44:11 · answer #5 · answered by el diablo sexy : ] 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Natural Family Planing is good and honors the marriage and God.
All other forms of BCD (Birth Control Devises) insult the marriage and God. It's like medicating life. Life is a sickness that needs to medicated because it's so bad. I believe life is good and I am grateful for the gift of my life.
2006-07-24 18:25:42 · answer #6 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe abortion should be this way. If someone wants an abortion-the mother, doctor, assistants and anyone else involved should be put to sleep after the baby is safely delivered.Put to sleep=death.
2006-07-24 18:24:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the more important question is if Giggly Giraffe should be allowed to procreate?
2006-07-24 19:32:10 · answer #8 · answered by go_to_girl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are fine. Neither is a bad thing... people should be able to control their childbearing for when they and only they are ready for it.
2006-07-24 18:25:00 · answer #9 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i THINK ITS A LAZY EXCUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO WERE TOO STUPID TO USE BIRTH CONTROL IN THE FIRST PLACE....I AM PRO-LIFE, AND THAT IS HOW I WILL ALWAYS FEEL ABOUT ABORTION AND THE LIKES OF IT.
2006-07-24 18:22:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋