I disagree with a government dictating something so personal. However, I understand the reasons behind it, and it has made a difference in the cities. The major problem is the practice of sex selection. This will lead to even bigger problems in the future when it comes to men finding wives. The other problem is that China is raising a generation of little emperors who have no understanding sibling relationships. In addition their tradition mandates that the children care for the parents and grandparents. That means one child can have 4 grandparents and 2 parents they will have care for, and that many people focusing all their attention on that child as he/she grows into a spoiled brat.
2006-07-24 17:52:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by tianjingabi 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
It makes good sense. It's all about the principle of carrying capacity. The Chinese, although they have proven to be crappy stewards of thier environment, are at least aware of the very real problem of overpopulation.
I think it would be great if America had similar limits. Maybe a 2 or even 3 child limit would be more than fair. I'm tired of hearing parents with 4 or 5 kids bitching about how hard it is on them financially. Especially considering that folks with no kids pay the majority of the bill as far as funding education, etc. They don't get tax breaks or tax credits, so they pay for a disproportionally high percentage of public services.
2006-07-24 09:23:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree that it is wrong. But I think that it is already causing disaster. It is making it impossible for China to move forward culturally. Because they can only have one child, it causes them to value boys over girls. Therefore some families do all sorts of horrible things when they have a girl. Some families only abandon them, but others go so far as to kill their girls. China's orpanages are filled with unwanted babies, especially girls. This is already a disaster.
2006-07-24 09:17:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Angela B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that if that's China's Policy why not Tie the woman's tubes after that first birth. That way she doens't conceive any children she will later lose or the government doesn't have to kill.
2006-07-24 09:17:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mary 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No with the aid of fact a baby is all people below 12. 15 is a young person. despite if reckoning on the adulthood, a fifteen year previous ought to be very infantile in his/her character etc while a 12 year previous could very nicely teach very a variety of of adulthood!
2016-10-08 06:49:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by blumenkrantz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
they already have a serious lack of women for all of the men in the country. Boys were kept alot more than girls. Girls were given away in secret, or killed.
2006-07-24 09:18:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
considering all the posions in the air due to the
pollution, women will not be able to reproduce therefore our
humanity will die out.
2006-07-24 09:20:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by eg_ansel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-07-24 18:01:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not me
2006-07-24 09:15:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Foosaaaah 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
wats rong
2006-07-24 21:02:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by kumar 1
·
0⤊
0⤋