Whats up with this whole theroy of evolution? I believe in creation, not evolution, anbody else with me?

Question

I DO NOT BELIEVE IN THIS WHOLE EVOLUTION THING. I WAS BROUGHT UP ON THE BIBLE AND MY BELIEF AND FAITH IN THE LORD GOD THE FATHER ALMIGHTY. I MEAN IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE OUT THERE BESIDES ME THAT FEELS THIS WAY? I THINK THE BIBLE SHOULD BE DISCUSSED MORE IN SCHOOLS, DITCH THE SCIENCE BOOKS, THEY ARE ALL WRONG.

Answer 1

I totally agree.
But how about instead of having the bible discussed more in schools, just get rid of the public schools all together. have the parents teach their children!

Answer 2

The fault with science today lies in the fact that there are those within the field of science who are disturbed by the implications of which the evidence that sientific research has uncovered. Many Christians wrongfully criticize the big bang theory not realizing that this discovery points to a begining of the universe and the logical conclusion that something outside the space/time continuum caused the universe to come into being. God speaking the universe into existence is the big bang of cosmology. In the realm of microbiology and research into the design and mechanics on the molecular level scientists are discovering tiny irreducible complex systems that evolution cannot possibly explain. Even farther into the realm of living organisms James Watson has been credited with breaking down the DNA code and thereby assertained that He proved that God was not involved in the creation of life. However to his discredit it is now being seen that there is a language being spoken in the DNA and it cannot be shown how it is possible that it could have been self written but that something outside of the language had to of developed it. Just one more finger of God speaking to us within creation. Finally in the fossil record they have what is known as the Cambrian explosion which is a record of the emergence of fully developed species without any evidence of a gradually developed fossil that would support evolution. So what science is discovering for us actually ends up supporting the idea of an intelligence behind creation.

The real problem lies not in science but in the refusal of so many people to allow the truth to get out. Some people who send their children to public school rise up against any teacher that proposes an honest critique of Darwinism. Some teachers are forced out of the arena of public education if they pursist in challenging Darwin. And finally you have the higher eschelon of academia and the mass media all joining together to silence those who want to teach true science and the evidence for a creator behind existence.

Answer 3

Only a total fool would believe in evolution as evolution denies the very existence of God. The Bible states that the fool has said in his heart that there is no God and God has declared man to be without excuse as the very creation testifies of the existence of God. Why is it that we live in an age where man is ever learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth? The evolutionists can come from monkeys if they want to but as for me I was created in the image of God.

Answer 4

With thoughts like this America will soon be no better than a fundamentalist Islamic state.
Don't allow students to learn science and think for themselves. Keep the population ignorant. Only teach them the holy book and punish anyone who thinks otherwise. After all, we are the center of the universe and our Christian God is the only god for the entire universe.

I would rather live in a country where you are free to have your beliefs and worship as you please.
By the way, there is more evidence for evolution than there is for "God" as you believe.

Answer 5

I am with you. It is so sad that our schools teach evolution like it's truth. It's so ridiculous. It takes more faith to believe something as far fetched as the theory of evolution than it does to believe in creation. If you are intelligent and you study it for yourself. So many people just go with the flow and believe what everybody else believes because that's what everybody else believes. How sad.

Answer 6

I've said it before and I'll say it again: If you hate science so much, throw away all your belongings-they were derived from science, and go live in the wilderness on faith alone. A la John the Baptist. As far as evolution is concerned, once you've decided to live in the wilderness on faith alone you will come in close contact with what is commonly known as survival of the fittest.

Answer 7

>What’s incorrect with believing in creation And Evolution? You propose, except that the former of both has really no data to help it and a superb volume of knowledge against it? >The Bible makes use of metaphor, parable, and symbolism to describe divine reality (that is a secret). Then the question will change into, WHY did it use metaphor, parable and symbolism? does no longer it were so a lot extra attainable, and a lot less puzzling and deceptive, if God had purely reported the precise reality contained in the Bible without disguising it in any way? there is not any solid reason the first bankruptcy of Geneis ought to no longer start up '13 billion, seven-hundred and 80-seven million, fifteen thousand 8 hundred and ninety-six years in the past, God created the Universe out of a tiny factor by increasing area and dividing the 4 standard forces out of the primordial quantum vacuum'. Why did God no longer write precisely that? no matter if that is so significant that we count number on him, why does he look attempting so hard to hide himself from us? It purely would not compute. A deistic god is extensively extra lifelike, and the most rational standpoint in any respect is that no gods exist contained in the first position. >pondering Genesis replaced into written about 5000 years in the past, doesn’t it make experience it does no longer clarify evolution if that replaced into the case? Excuse me. If the deity you're talking about replaced into effective sufficient to create the total Universe out of nowhere, fairly he does no longer enable himself be dissuaded by the clinical lack of expertise of primitive civilizations? The Bible is meant to be a e book of revelation and non secular reality, yet if what you're affirming is the case, then curiously God has determined that coddling to early civilizations' lack of clinical expertise is extra significant than affirming the actual data. Like I say, it purely would not upload up; no genuine deity ought to do something like that. >Is the Bible a technological understanding e book, a heritage e book, or a non secular e book about God’s courting to people? If it truly does represent divine revelation from an omnisceint deity, there is not any solid reason it may no longer be all 3, and there is almost easily no solid reason it ought to get most of the first 2 downright incorrect. Writing blatant clinical and historic falsehoods right into a e book isn't a good thanks to get human beings to hearken to its non secular message, and a supremely sensible deity ought to do not forget that.

Answer 8

Until you can study the theory of evolution with an open mind and then, make a decision about what you think, you have NO RIGHT to say--Ditch the science books. You are parroting what others have told you, not what you yourself think.

Answer 9

I am not with you. I think for myself and am too educated to believe in the Bible hoax.

Students don't need more fiction like the Bible. They need more math and science and practical knowledge. There is no time for make believe in the real world!

Answer 10

I was born athesist. I was raised atheist. Why do I NOW beleive in creationism and god?
A little book called 'Evolution Cruncher'.
Ask me personally any question involving evolution, the big bang, etc. and I will disprove it. [e-mail].