i believe it was prada. hey doesn't the devil wear prada. oh wait that is just a fictional movie isn't it. oh well.
2006-07-24 11:57:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would presume it was a sandal, that being the prevailing mode at the time. Course, it could also have been barefoot. What's the difference? And why ask Creationists, specifically? Do you imagine none of us believe man and dinosaur coexisted?
Think again.
Never be afraid to think it through!
2006-07-24 15:46:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by kaththea s 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is tabloud journalism. It's only good for causing confusion.
Adder_Astros
Powerful Member of the House of Light.
[]xxxxx[];;;;;;;;;;;;;>.
htto://www.adderastros.com
2006-07-24 15:49:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
please give us a reference, for those who maybe missed something where someone found a human footprint inside a dino-print? I have not seen this yet.
2006-07-25 10:57:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doc Martens. They have bouncy soles.
2006-07-24 15:45:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The foot was bare. But you are soooooooooo cute and clever.
2006-07-24 15:44:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by happygirl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not cool! Creation is better then Evolution any day!
2006-07-25 10:29:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Da Great 1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
good point to consider
2006-07-24 15:43:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL! Good one.
2006-07-24 15:43:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by bc_munkee 5
·
0⤊
0⤋