it's too bad we dont have any dna to work with... that would be so cool
im not a christian but im amused by the idea of such scandal
2006-07-24 08:35:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by the_quetzal 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
We are all descendants from ADAM and EVE including Kathleen McGowen or has Kathleen McGowen only read her 'Bank Account' and not her Bible?....enough said.
2006-07-24 15:40:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by oldtimer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is blasphemous and anyone who believes her is a fool. There is no way she could know if she was related to someone from 2000 years ago. After 2000 years of generations her DNA would be so different that it would be impossible to do a comparison.
2006-07-24 15:37:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dysthymia 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
She is a crook trying to exploit people. She can't be the descendant if they never had a child (contrary to what Dan Brown claims, the idea that the two were married is ludicrous) nor is there any way for her to prove it.
2006-07-24 15:35:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by koresh419 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no Biblical evidence or historical evidence that Jesus married Mary M. or that he had any children. It would be interesting to see how she establishes her blood line. Blasphemy? The claim itself isn't necessarily, but I would be very surprised if her book turns out not to be.
2006-07-24 15:40:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by happygirl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me see her change water to wine and I might believe her. The descent of Jesus would have his power. In other words she is a big fat fake liar. If Jesus had a child he would not have been pure enough to die on the cross for our sins.
2006-07-24 15:37:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
jesus was only sent for one reason to save us all not to get in a realationship with someone if mary m, was alive she would be able to explain everything people dont take the tabloids true thats why they call them the tabloids i like to read them then make fron of them lol humor any wat even if you say it on the news it does not mean believe it
2006-07-24 15:37:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by liveslifelikeitcomes 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
its not true it was only a fiction story like tarsan Jesus was not married and did not have children if he had it would certainly have been mentioned in the bible.
2006-07-24 15:37:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mim 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The moment she claims she is a decendent of Christ by the flesh, then she is anti-Christ!
2006-07-24 15:36:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by positive 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it's blasphemous; in fact, I think it makes sense.
2006-07-24 15:41:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by annoying_bookworm23 2
·
0⤊
0⤋