Debating evolution is like debating whether apples fall from trees or whether rain comes from clouds.
Its sad we must even dignify the issue with the word "debate".
That being said, since the vast majority of creationists or doubters of evolution are generally unable to speak scientifically, they probably know they would get their a$$ handing to them in a scientific forum.
You know, things like evidence, big words and structured thinking can confuse the trite "goddidit" style most are accustomed too here.
2006-07-24 07:14:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by QED 5
·
7⤊
3⤋
This is because there is no debate on this in the scientific community because the know the evidence for it is undeniable. In science, its a done deal, not any old hypothesis makes it into a Scientific Theory like gravity, relativity, and electromagnetism.
There is debate in the religious community however, as they haven't yet caught up with the science, and try to rubbish the wrong things through their misunderstandings.
Thus Creationist/Evolution debates happen in religious forums not science ones.
2006-07-24 07:25:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Xenu.net 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't do it, in my opinion, yet specific, I truthfully have considered creationists doing their ideal to debunk evolutionary theory in the technological know-how and anthropology sections. It would not ensue as often as what you pronounced, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it does ensue. the reason of this ''anti-faith''? a good sort of those atheists grew up in Christian families, and it sort of feels they sense like they have a bone to %. with Christianity. There are some particularly cool atheist regulars in this internet site which could truthfully undertaking my innovations often times with an thrilling theory or 2 although. i will the two appreciate and luxuriate in that, yet those that in simple terms ensue just to insult people are those I forget approximately. Peace, Drew
2016-11-02 21:55:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually they do debate this in science.
Just do a question search on "why are there still monkeys" and see how many different sections it pops up in.
2006-07-24 07:51:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sage Bluestorm 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are complete opposites.
Geology shows that fossils are of different ages. Paleontology shows a fossil sequence, the list of species represented changes through time. Taxonomy shows biological relationships among species. Evolution is the explanation that threads it all together. Creationism is the practice of squeezing one's eyes shut and wailing 'does not!'
2006-07-24 07:12:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, that's what I think, but people seem to want to debate it as a religion vrs science issue. Even though they aren't contradictions of each other.
2006-07-24 07:12:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by mury902 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since God is omnipotent and omniscient, he doesn't need science. He can create without science or any physical law. "We" need science in order to attempt an explanation.
2006-07-24 07:16:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is basic thing to understand GOD and Gods creations.so its religious as well as science.
2006-07-24 07:17:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I posed that same question . I called it Quantum Spirituality. Got some interesting answers. Peace and Love
2006-07-24 07:15:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by digilook 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yup, it does belong in science. But, we'll find it here as long as fundies use evolution as an example of satans work. cheers
2006-07-24 08:16:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋