English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just wanna know

2006-07-24 05:31:46 · 23 answers · asked by lara 2 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

23 answers

You mean generalizing an entire nation based on the actions of a few? If you consider them terrorists, then every nation in the world is a terrorist, because every nation contains a terrorist group.

America itself was founded on terrorism. The American resistance fighters during the revolutionary war were considered terrorists by the English government, and yet we view them as heros.

2006-07-24 05:35:08 · answer #1 · answered by djmasseeh21 3 · 0 0

That depends on the way you define 'terrorist'. In my opinion a terrorist is someone who invades a country because of what someone inside the country did, and kills 381 in just two weeks.

I think your definition is more like someone who resists an occupying force within there country with guerrilla warfare.

If the latter is the one you're going by, than I'd say that some Arabs are terrorists, but then again, by that definition so were American revolutionaries, french resisters, and the afghan mujaheddin (the ones that fought the soviets).

I think that you should cease your racism as the world has enough of it already.

2006-07-24 05:47:25 · answer #2 · answered by John S 4 · 0 0

Nobody can say Arabs are terrorists.

Your question should have been: "in ur opinion r" Muslims "terrorists?/?" You can't single out one race of people. Terrorism runs the gamut of all races and nationalities.

Oh, and for all you Muslim collaborators, before you slam me for singling out the Muslims for terrorism, when is the last time you heard of a Christian strapping a bomb to their chest and blowing a pizza parlor and all the people inside it to Kingdom Come?

Where did you learn grammar? It's evident you need more training.

We don't have to be so cheap with characters anymore. That problem went the way of the .coms in the Nineties. What you have done is just plain laziness.

2006-07-24 08:30:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First off, arab does not equal Muslim. There are arabs of many faiths and I'm sure even some atheists (if you truly can be an atheist).
Now, IMHO are ALL Muslims terrorists? No, but it does see to me that a majority of Muslims either actively or tacitly support the actions of those that would commit terrorist acts. I have heard many times about Muslims "not wanting to name" the people in their communities who are planning attacks. That bothers me. It bother me that as a group, followers of Islam will riot over a cartoon, but not take to the streets against bombings in England, Spain, or India. It bothers me that they don't take to the streets over killings between shiites and sunnis.

2006-07-24 05:42:30 · answer #4 · answered by Robb 5 · 0 0

No! Just few of them, who mis interprete the Koran..

I have arab friends.. So is the President of the United States.. Very close friends with the king of Saudi and the ambassador of Saudi.

Here is a fact. Do you know that these arabs are even invited to the white house to have dinner.

Another fact. Bush are good friends with the Bin Laden family.. They even had dinner after 9/11

2006-07-24 05:39:53 · answer #5 · answered by emac4lyf 4 · 0 0

Of Course not! and arab is a person that comes from a country that primarily speaks arabic, and I do not believe that every arab speaking person is a terrorist. Thats like saying half of the people on earth is terrorist. You choose to be terrorist, McVay was a terrorist and he spoke english, there are many terrorist in Columbia that are not arabs. So no, arabs are not terrorists, people choose to be terrorists.

2006-07-24 05:39:27 · answer #6 · answered by Carrie 1 · 0 0

The ones that brought down the Two Towers in NY were terrorists of the worst sort.

2006-07-24 05:35:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not all of them will do the terrorism thing. Most will just watch helpless from the sidelines I think. But probably the vast majority would support them if given a choice. I hope not but that may be true.

2006-07-24 05:37:06 · answer #8 · answered by cherie 2 · 0 0

No , sure the terrorists are the iserali and american troops , you can see how they kill many in Palestine and Lebanon and Iraq
they use illegal weapons , many childeran and civilians get killed there why ?????? they name the legal resistance in Lebanon and Palestine AS terrrorist , but UN law itself give them the right to resistant occupied force

2006-07-24 05:40:00 · answer #9 · answered by m1a1 2 · 0 0

terrorist does not relate to any race... they can be a group of many races too.... the real terrorist are those whoe kill the masses without reasons... a close example is israel to lubnan currently. what right does israel has to invade and kill people in lbnan, while what they are hunting is the palestinean, not lebanese.... thats terrorists. act.

2006-07-24 05:38:05 · answer #10 · answered by n9flyboy 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers