http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/books/news/article1191931.ece
2006-07-24 02:27:21 · 16 answers · asked by idspudnik 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Whether Jesus and Mary had descendants is probably one of the biggest mysteries of all times.
Sang real or "royal blood" is just one of the names for the holy grail, indicating that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married and that they had a child together. This child, a fruit of Magdalene's womb (chalice) would indicate a possibility of a descendant of royal blood. Obviously, you know all this already.
There are many hypotheses about the Holy grail. Many believe that the grail is symbology for the illumination of the spirit and mind. Try flicking through some freemason theories to broaden your horizons.
Last but not least, even if this woman is who she claims to be, a direct blood lineage will never be able to be traced. A great publicity stunt though, don't you think?
2006-07-24 02:48:56 · answer #1 · answered by tuumac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. There are no physical decendents of Jesus Christ. The Christ did not take wives or lovers from humankind, either before or after His crucifixion.
This is not a new claim. Gnostic heretics claimed to have "secret" knowledge about God/Jesus just a few hundred years after His earthly ministry, but it was shown to be false even then. Jesus did NOTHING in secret. His entire life was on display.
The people claiming to be "descended" from Jesus are trying
to claim that relationship in order to rule over others. Prime examples are the French Merovingian dynasty and Joseph Smith (founder of Mormonism).
2006-07-24 09:43:42 · answer #2 · answered by MamaBear 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anything is possible. It was rare for a 30 year old Jew to be single during that time period. I don't know why Christians can't except that he could have been married with Mary Magdallen and couldnt they have had a child? Again, not something that would have been out of the ordinary.
But the lady being a descendant... I don't know... there are many mysteries in the universe
2006-07-24 09:38:33 · answer #3 · answered by Mac 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
da vinci was a good book but i think she is not the descendant of jesus .some people can do anything for fame because she know is she claims herself as a descendant people will start to worship her and she will become famous because its not a joke to be a descendant of a jesus she will become more powerful than the pope .
2006-07-24 09:39:42 · answer #4 · answered by nandini_misra 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This woman is out of her family tree.
Want proof that the Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction? Go to the following website and read the article about the Da Vinci Code. You'll feel silly for ever believing the Da Vinci Code was true.
2006-07-24 09:36:08 · answer #5 · answered by songoftheforest 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can do you one better. I am a sister of Jesus my husband is a brother of Jesus. So are all other Christians. Want prove. Read Romans 8:14 -17 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father The Spirit itself bearth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with Him, that we may be also glorified together.
2006-07-24 09:41:20 · answer #6 · answered by PREACHER'S WIFE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely Not. For that matter there are no descendants of Jesus.
2006-07-24 09:31:03 · answer #7 · answered by P P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IF YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN YOU ARE A DESCENDANT OF JESUS AS A MATTER OF FACT EVERY ONE IS.BELIEVE IT OR NOT
2006-07-24 09:33:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is she going after him for the money?
The glory?
Or the fame?
2006-07-24 09:34:10 · answer #9 · answered by DanielofD 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Christ did not physically produce children.
2006-07-24 09:31:38 · answer #10 · answered by Lundy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋