The only thing even close to being an "anachronism" in the Bible would be the appearance of Moses and Elijah with Jesus when he was transfigured (Matthew 17:3, Mark 9:4 and Luke 9:30).
I am not implying this is an error, only acknowledging that it's unusual for ancient folks to suddenly appear in what were then "modern times." Unbelievers would certainly feel this is an error, however.
2006-07-24 01:29:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Suzanne: YPA 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Our previous 1994 international e book Encyclopedia notes in volume 10, web page 100 and forty four less than "Indian, American" then less than "Transportation" that the wheel replaced into generic yet "under no circumstances developed." yet in addition they be conscious the Incas and Mayas "outfitted astounding roads," which shows they'd a reason which could have in contact wheeled automobiles. all of us understand they moved wide stones in progression their cities. contained in the 1953 version of e book of Mormon Evidences in historic u . s ., by Dewey Farnsworth, web page 154 depicts a pre-Columbian wheeled toy, web page 100 and fifty 5 gives you a photo of four wide historic stone wheels got here across at Tiahuanaco, in Bolivia.
2016-10-15 03:40:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by garfield 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since it has been translated from Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic, it would probably pretty hard to find one in English. But, I don't know for sure.
2006-07-24 01:22:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by nancy jo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dispensations.Yes!
2006-07-24 01:18:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible books are'nt in chronological order.
Is that what you are after?
2006-07-24 01:14:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by rangedog 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
apparantly you can see charleston heston's watch as he splits the sea in the movie, lol
2006-07-24 06:37:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No...
2006-07-24 01:18:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by griffinswinsky 3
·
0⤊
0⤋