English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

.. of his non-butt pirate related teachings?

Would you still be able find salavation through him or would you take your chances with a less girly Satan?

2006-07-23 15:27:10 · 16 answers · asked by Nerdly Stud 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

sure I meant salvation or did I?

2006-07-23 15:28:08 · update #1

A lot of you people are saying Jesus wasn't a homo. As Kent Hovind would say, "How do you know? WERE YOU THERE?"

2006-07-23 15:54:03 · update #2

16 answers

Nope, I don't think that would invalidate his teachings. If it were the case his teachings would still be valuable and If it were the case then that doesn't really change anything about the salvation that one can attain through Jesus (according to Christian theology). The reason: According to Christian theology Jesus never had sex and was never married. So even if he was a homosexual and had the romantic and sexual desires towards the same sex instead of the opposite sex, according to Christian theology he never acted upon his sexual and romantic interests. He was totally focused on God and on his mission. That said, since the Bible only condemns sexual activity outside of marriage and homosexual sexual activity as sinful, then Jesus is still pure because Christian theology says that he never engaged in sexual activity, that he was celibate. Thus Jesus's sacrifice is still valid, still pure. Christianity would NOT have to change any of its teachings (it currently accepts homosexuals, but they must be celibate and not even have a romantic relationship with the same sex). Thus, If Jesus were a homo it wouldn't change anything. Hetero, homo, doesn't matter (and the Bible doesn't bother to tell us because it also seems to think that such a subject is nonimportant....and really it is).

And all of this is said by a homo Hindu! :) (I used to be a Christian, though...even was a missionary for awhile)

2006-07-23 17:22:13 · answer #1 · answered by gabriel_zachary 5 · 1 1

Look, first of all it is against the Bible. Also, in order to save the world, it had to take a man without sin to save the world. Being a homo is a sin regardless of how you put it. So Jesus must have been without sin in order to save the world. So he cant be a homo.

2006-07-23 23:15:28 · answer #2 · answered by Beatrice 1 · 0 0

Jesus was not a homo, he obeyed God the Father and was pleasing to Him. Homosexual relations, hardness of the heart (figuratively of course) and other such actions as liars, adulterers, cheaters, etc. that are clearly contrary to God's plan for mankind and Biblical writings are what separate man from God. God does love all people but also requires our adherence to His word. Disobedience results in numerous problems for all involved, separation for God and that is across the board for all sins. Life is hard enough in normal male-female relationships, why complicate things?

The homosexual community suffers greatly at it's own hand and by its own practices. Homosexuality is a behavioral choice. Practitioners of the lifestyle suffer higher rates of AIDS/ HIV, hepatitis, syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, liver disease, other STD and other disease than the remaining population at large by ranges of 25% and greater. Many who practice homosexuality have drug issues, were abused as kids in various ways, have various degrees of mental distress or illness.

Homosexuality can be forgiven, it is a sin as are a number of other behaviors that are against God's will. We all have choices to follow God or not. Satan was cast out from heaven by God. He knows that God and Christ are and trembles at the future that awaits him, so why would you want to follow a looser like Satan? Choose wisely.

2006-07-23 22:48:21 · answer #3 · answered by hithere2ya 5 · 0 0

He wasn't so it doesn't matter. That is like saying if 2 plus 2 equals 7 should we stop eating green peas on tuesday, or only skip rope on our hands with shoes on our pinkies while birds are on fire and the moon is in the river. Makes no sense does it?

2006-07-23 22:30:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Jesus wasn't homo and don't say that stuff about Jesus or else God's gonna make you burn in hell, unless you already accepted Jesus as your savior.

2006-07-23 22:34:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is a sick question! Where do people come up with questions like this? Obviously, if you are not following God, then you are following Satan. That's where the sick stuff is coming from. I will live for God, but your question reflects who you choose to live for.

2006-07-23 22:34:55 · answer #6 · answered by georgiapeach 4 · 0 0

Jesus never actually said anything about homosexuals . . . at least, the actual records of his life he didn't. that was largely to combat the roman empire, which has lots of homosexuality and persecuted Jesus and his followers. (not christian, just informed)

2006-07-23 22:31:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If Jesus were a homo? If you were a bug. I would squash you and then feed you to my parakeet.

2006-07-24 00:24:52 · answer #8 · answered by Namaste 2 · 0 0

I think I recall him having relations with men. One has to read inbetween the lines...

2006-07-23 22:31:09 · answer #9 · answered by space_occupied 2 · 0 0

i haf always suspected he is gay too... but if i haf to choose, i guess he is the lesser of the 2 evils...simply becos satanism encourages incest which is soooo effing gross. plus im ok with homosexuals...

2006-07-23 22:34:14 · answer #10 · answered by lulu 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers