2006-07-23 13:20:24 · 6 answers · asked by ChiefNickNameadvancer 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Rocket launchers are generally inefficient weapons, unless you tend to want to destroy large areas that are unarmored.
Thus, they are great as mass assault weapons against civilian targets, but tend to be effective against other military forces only when of sufficient power and accuracy.
2006-07-23 13:22:46 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you "need" to take someone out, then a good sniper with a good rifle works just fine. rocket launchers. Great for large targets, but hardly efficient against an individual.
2006-07-23 13:26:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We need to get the video game developers to start designing real-world weapons platforms. I wanna be able to destroy vast areas of the mid east with impunity, from the comfort of my home computer.
2006-07-23 14:13:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Why try to kill a specific group of people? You know, Jeffrey Damar was American...
So, not ALL people are bad from one specific group. I guess that's what they mean by prejudice, though.
2006-07-23 13:25:05 · answer #4 · answered by fragglerockqueen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the other guy and I would use them, inefficient as they might be, on the Taliban.
2006-07-23 13:25:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
id use it to shoot you up the ***, freak
2006-07-24 06:27:21 · answer #6 · answered by freebuns76 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋