2006-07-23 09:01:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Whether there exists a God can't be proven. It can't be disproven, so to totally discount the possibility is closed-minded. Being closed-minded has the appearance of being stupid.
2006-07-23 09:06:02 · answer #1 · answered by T Time 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That doesn't even make sense, since they are Agnostic, they are closer to being Atheist than Cristian's. I think some people have a hard time of realizing that there is nothing after death and that there is nobody that can save them. Ex: If your life sucks and you pray things will get better. People don't like to take personal responsibility. Agnostics are just hanging on to hope while Cristian's devote their life to a Santa Clause figure and Atheists are just who they are.
2006-07-23 16:07:26 · answer #2 · answered by Candi H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What? An Agnostic believes that there is some other existence after this one. An Atheist believes that this is it, there is nothing else. And Christians believe all kinds of stuff.
2006-07-23 18:00:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no tangible proof that god does or does not exist. Christians and atheists have personal, subjective beliefs as to the existence of a god, and of how they do or do not experience god in their lives. To argue about the existence of god and manifestations of a god is pointless as no one has such knowledge; it is all faith. Atheists cannot prove a god does not exist, and Christians cannot prove one does exist; therefore, agnostics feel they have the correct answer to this question by saying "I don't know". In the end, it would appear that christians would have a safer bet than atheists, because if a god does exist they will go to "heaven" and the atheist will go to "hell".
2006-07-23 16:20:59 · answer #4 · answered by tigerlily 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Christians believe pretty little bed time stories to get them through their lives.
Atheists spend all their time being angry about those fables and myths and trying to disprove them.
Agnostics are open minded enough to know that they don't know everything and are willing to listen to both sides.
Hope this helps.
2006-07-23 16:16:51 · answer #5 · answered by kiz_ma_az 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they think that god's existence can neither be proven nor disproven - so they question god's existence. However, it's perhaps a safer bet to have faith (just in case), so an atheist would then be the most stupid of the three.
I'm an atheist as I cannot fathom a god who/what would choose earth (a nothing in our universe) as the mainplace for his indulgence.
2006-07-23 16:15:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never heard them say that. I call myself an atheist, but really I am agnostic. I think that it is stupid to claim that you know there is a god and equally stupid to claim that you know that there isn't a god.
2006-07-23 16:18:37 · answer #7 · answered by creative 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Disobeying mom.
2006-07-23 16:19:11 · answer #8 · answered by beek 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of their wrong they're wrong, and if they're right they're angry over nothing.
2006-07-23 16:07:04 · answer #9 · answered by miknave 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
an open mind?
2006-07-23 17:16:58 · answer #10 · answered by Stuie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋