English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-23 06:32:35 · 6 answers · asked by tanner_1122 5 in Sports Cycling

Floyd Landis caputures Tour de France

2006-07-23 06:33:15 · update #1

6 answers

First, I wanted to correct some misinformation provided by another person answering your question. Floyd Landis won Stage 17 of the 2006 Tour de France in addition to claiming the top spot this year in the overall standings. Also, you can't simply eliminate the wins posted by Lance Armstrong as one person argued because of his supposed superhuman ability; he couldn't have won seven Tours in a row without the support of his Discovery/U.S. Postal mates. Additionally, if Greg LeMond hadn't suffered a tragic hunting accident, he might well have won five Tours in a row. Americans have now won 11 of the last 21 Tours. By any measure, that's an outstanding achievement.

As to your question specifically, Bob Roll, a former Tour cyclist and a commentator for OLN, has suggested the reason for the American's success is they have to come so far and have to work so hard to obtain sponsorship as they climb the professional cycling ladder that they are perhaps more dedicated to winning the most prestigious cycling race in the world. That might also account for the Australian's success, too. After all, Robbie McEwan has won the green jersey (a title awarded to the fastest sprinter) in the Tour de France three of the last five years.

Floyd may not recover from off-season hip surgery to regain his championship status. But we should rejoice in his success and celebrate the achievements of all American cyclists.

2006-07-23 08:52:33 · answer #1 · answered by metimoteo 6 · 0 0

the first theory that got here to my options upon reading this placed up replaced into a million. WHY is college classes value is u . s . ridiculously severe priced? WHY do colleges choose a lot funds? a college isn't an organization like Apple or Microsoft. My sister will graduate from her 4 years of faculty quickly and the total coast of classes pee paid throughout those 4 years....is OMG too a lot. the quantity is very nearly as a lot because the U.S. nationwide debt. 2. do colleges truly choose a range of of money? 3. u . s . is at the moment dealing with an economic disaster; that is anticipated to be between the worst ever in U.S. heritage. So unemployment is a starting to be difficulty, the business device is getting spoiled and there are extra possibility free voters suffering below the poverty line. and that i'm no longer against the authorities besides the undeniable fact that the federal authorities would not look sorting it out properly. i do not do not forget that a lot about the ecnonomy, so I discovered from my sister (she's a organization / economics significant) and that i will tell that the rustic, the business device and so on are all dealing with a disaster. Soo....i do not understand yet except the authorities supplies you to love help the undesirable pay for faculty or something I strongly propose that faculties do no longer strengthen classes expenses. in the different case...u . s . will face a good worse academic disaster. Does the stuff I typed make experience? wish it does. And......the solid information is that the severe priced classes value paid to a spectacular college replaced into easily worth it on account that my sister were given a spectacular pastime 2 weeks beforehand commencement.

2016-10-15 03:04:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well, actually, there haven't been enough numbers of people to make a statistical analysis. First off, you have to take Lance Armstrong out of the picture. That man is just an anomaly. He doesn't even have normal physiology. His mindset is off the chart. He's like superhuman.
Now, taking Lance out of the picture and the list of American winners drops down to Landis and LeMond. I think they're it. That's not a very convincing majority. Not only that, but I didn't read anywhere where Landis actually won a stage. It's a bit disgraceful to win the Tour and not win at least one stage.
A better question is why did it take almost a century to get to a competitive basis in the Tour?

2006-07-23 06:38:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know, but any time an American wins a global competition, I'm proud and pleased. I never cared anything for Lance Armstrong, but he wore the red, white and blue and that was good enough for me.

Way to go Floyd!!


By the way, some answers here may display a disgusting level of hatred some Americans seem to harbor for the French. I'm hoping against hope that it doesn't happen here, but I expect it.

2006-07-23 06:36:35 · answer #4 · answered by ratboy 7 · 0 0

fortitudinousskeptic, Landis won stage 17, on July 20th from St.-Jean-de-Maurienne to Morzine

I agree with your comment, though.

2006-07-23 08:38:32 · answer #5 · answered by Matt 5 · 0 0

we have better performance enhancing drugs

2006-07-23 06:37:25 · answer #6 · answered by gruntlicker 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers