English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've heard prophetic statements like "Araq for Israel!" & "Hesbollah is going down!" Of course that will mean freedom of religion in Iraq & Israel.

2006-07-23 06:18:34 · 12 answers · asked by t_a_m_i_l 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Infinity has best answer.

Freedom of religion is exactly what it means. Freedom to seek God.

Iraq's constitution they still allow people to be Killed for their religion under sharia/Islam law.

In Israel, God is restoring it. Thy need to repent humbly to the Messiah. Biblical proportions are from the Egyptian River to the Euphraties river.

2006-07-23 09:29:02 · update #1

Keven, You're being a false prophet. You better repent soon.

2006-07-25 07:24:12 · update #2

ThomasJefferson wrote (not in constitution) separation of church & state. He meant that we can not have a government or state church. Finances are given to all religions or none.

2006-07-25 07:28:30 · update #3

Thomas Jefferson is in Heaven with the Lord Jesus Christ & would not go against God's purposes.

2006-07-25 07:32:42 · update #4

President Bush won by more than 3,000,000 popular votes at the last election. Plus winning the electorial votes. That was God. So was the electorial vote win against Gore, where George lost the popular vote.

2006-07-25 07:40:33 · update #5

12 answers

God did put Bush where he is, just as He puts all people in authority where they are. Jesus told Pilate, "You would have no power over me if it had not been given to you from above" (Jn 19:11).

Jasto,
You obviously have no idea how electoral votes work. The Florida judiciary cannot force the "electors" to vote for anybody, because there are no "electors". Each state has a certain number of electoral votes based on population. Whichever canidate wins the most popular votes in a state gets that state's electoral votes - be two or five.

When you write such obviously erronious blabber, it ruins your credibility and destroys your own argument. Get an education.

2006-07-23 06:50:15 · answer #1 · answered by infinity 3 · 2 2

Silly Infinity - Florida certainly did what Jasto said they did. I suggest when your world view is based on myth, delusion, and lies, you ought to refrain from calling other's uneducated. In this case, you are revealed as uninformed, Jasto as informed.

s been 132 years since the Florida Legislature got this involved in presidential politics, but some things never change. The GOP majority wanted to send a Republican to the White House then and it does now.

The GOP leaders of the House and Senate have decided to convene a special session Friday to choose the state's 25 presidential electors. With solid Republican majorities in both chambers, the aim is to declare George W. Bush the winner in Florida if Al Gore still is mounting legal challenges next Tuesday, the deadline for states to name their electors.

House Speaker Tom Feeney, asked Thursday whether he has been in touch with Bush campaign officials, said he's "talked to a lot of Bush and Gore supporters in the last 24 hours."

He said that Wednesday evening, after announcing the special session, he spoke with "the Bush folks," Florida Republican Chairman Al Cardenas and other party officials. He insisted the discussions involved the role of Bush electors, not the special session.

Prior to Wednesday night, Feeney said his conversations have been with "friends who work at the (state Republican) party who were over there full time and the party has been taken over by folks from 49 other states that are coming down here and telling the party folks how to run things."

orida Gov. Jeb Bush already has signed a certified slate of Republican electors for his brother, based on the 537-vote victory margin announced last month by the GOP secretary of state. If the courts invalidate that slate because of Gore's pending legal actions, the Legislature could use the session to override with a Bush slate.

In an interview Thursday on NBC's "Today" show, Frankel said: "We had a lawful election. Six million voters went to the polls on Nov. 7. Mr. Bush has had his electors certified to Washington. Until and unless a court would overturn that by allowing a recount and if Mr. Gore should have the most votes, then his electors would be certified. ... This Legislature has now become the political arm of the George Bush campaign. They are predetermined that George Bush wins this election at all costs."

2006-07-23 21:47:57 · answer #2 · answered by t jefferson 3 · 0 0

People voted. Perhaps some votes were acquired in less-than-wholesome ways, perhaps not. Even without the questionable ones, a very large portion of people obviously had to vote for Pres. Bush, or he wouldn't have even had a chance. Either term. Yet, there he sits...

Hindsight seems so vivid and clear for people now that they are dissatisfied with the way the job is being done. The most logical recourse is to choose more carefully BEFORE you vote. Or perhaps immigrate to a place where the people and their chosen leaders more accurately reflect your own views.

But then, what would the nay-sayers do to occupy their time, with no picket signs to manufacture and no global electronic pandering to spam us all with?

2006-07-23 13:34:31 · answer #3 · answered by -=eXiLe=- 2 · 0 0

this is when religion gets scary... . . . Bush is in office by twicking the votes in flordia and ohio, drrr! why would god want to put so much pain through everyone? god doesn't do those things people do, I think your think of the prophcy that the world will end after 100 years of peace, which so far haven't came and from the looks of it is very far off, We are in a war that has been going on since the start of man.. .. . .

2006-07-23 13:24:02 · answer #4 · answered by R.R 3 · 0 0

Naw. Satan gave Bush his seat and power and great authority. I haven't decided whether Bush is aware of it or not. What was that thing on his back at the second or third debate in '04? Brushed that under the ol' rug, didn't they?

2006-07-23 16:08:17 · answer #5 · answered by rachelframecory 4 · 0 0

I never said I was claiming Iraq or Israel...who told you my fathers divine plan to take all of the sand countrys and turn them into the a sex theme park... shame on you for spilling the secret.

2006-07-23 13:23:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If by "freedom" of religion you mean subjugated to Christianity through illegitimate conquest ... then perhaps. But I wouldn't call it freedom ... not in the least. Slavery sounds more appropriate.

2006-07-23 13:35:37 · answer #7 · answered by Arkangyle 4 · 0 0

The main problem in this world is people like you who try to justify everything with their twisted understanding of religion.

2006-07-23 13:23:47 · answer #8 · answered by A K 5 · 0 0

Illuminati put bush in power.....its all about the money

2006-07-23 13:23:06 · answer #9 · answered by easynow 1 · 0 0

LOL

I dont know but i find this question funny.

2006-07-23 13:22:40 · answer #10 · answered by DeathStar 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers