why is it that sex offenders have to prey upon children, & should there be a death penalty for the crime?

Question

and why is it that men get harsh punishment and not women

Answer 1

Not all sex offenders prey on children, usually just the sick bastard pedophiles. I believe it there should be a death penalty for it, but only if the victim requests it. Sexual molestation of a child is already a capitol offense in Louisiana.

Answer 2

Good question. I actually did a paper on this a couple of quarters ago that required a lot of research. Although it seems the U.S. is doing more and more to prevent and stop sex offenders the fact is is that it isn't enough. Once they have been convicted there should be no turning back on their punishment. Meaning that there punishment should require lifetime treatment and it doesn't. Predators prey on children simply because they are easy prey and they like the feeling of control. It's sad really. A death penalty? I don't know how to answer that and be fair. As a parent, I would like to say yes. There should definitely be a death penalty for the crime. However, if I were the parent of the offender I may see if differently. As concerned Americans, we should all make a stand and let it be known how the peoplee feel about sex offenders all together. Sex offenders of children and adults. Did you know that while an offender id incarcerated, they are not even required to seek counseling? It is optional. So, if they choose to just live out their time with three hots and a cot, they can. It's a shame. Therefore, you have to take a stand and be heard, whatever that may require and get people involved!

Answer 3

Some states have the death penalty if the victim is younger than 11. Not all sex offenders are predators, however, You can get put on that list for urinating in public, or dating a 17 year old when you are 18

Answer 4

Why would any one harm a child ? Because they are weak and afraid of a real challenge. Not only are they sick , little wiennie-wackin , bastards - They are cowards and lack the ability to "pick on someone there own size " And obviously cannot begin to interact with the opposite sex , let alone have any sort of normal relationship.I don't have any pity for them ( male or female ) they should all be hung by the neck until they no longer live - and I believe it should be in public for all to see - on every T.V. station - LIVE AS IT HAPPENS!!! And none of this "give them one more chance , crap !!! " Let them out to hurt another child ? That is too high a price to pay- We will be well rid of scum like that - DEATH PENALTY ???Even though death is to good for cullion the world need be rid of them all , for the sake of our children.

Answer 5

in SOME case's "SEX" offenders have been preyed on themselve's, and never told-and or never got the help the they needed to help them get through the experience. Its unfortuanate in our society, that this gooes on -unnnoticed in alot of cases-and brutally in some. a molester or rapist needs the control to make them feel worthy-just like an abuser-should there be a death penalty? absolutely-the perpertrator-KNOWS-what they are doing is wrong, (in most cases) as they were victims themselves, and by taking the life of an innocent child-to hide their guilt-and fear-of being caught-is animalistic-and deserves the death penalty-no appeals-just get it done.
why do men seem to have it worse than woman?-thats a very good question, that our government needs to look at.I believe these laws need to be reevaluated, revamped-the crime should fit the punishment, no matter who the punisher is.
Like for instance -a teacher thet has formed a bond with a child 14-15 years old-yes that is still a child-and has sex with that child-that is a crime-that to me is also molestation-but in one case a female "teacher" claims by-polar-disorder and gets probation-but a male teacher who claims by-polar-he gets twenty years-these "by-polar" criteria's need to also be reevaluated-too many people out there crying wolf-and using this disorder to their benefit-hurts everyone involved.
when a child lives through a "molestation or rape" it does not end there, it remains with that child FOR LIFE.
so therfore i believe that anyone who molests a child-should get serious time-anyone who kills a person while commiting the act of a sex crime, should be put to death.
they have released too many sex offenders back into the society, saying that they are rehabilitated-only to see that these offenders do it again, in alot of cases, they commit death.
there is a website that you can go to to see if there are any sex offenders in your area-it is a very helpful tool

it is familywatchdog.us, it is sad to see who lives next door-

this is my sole opinion-and i hope i have given you some insight to your question.

Answer 6

Some states actually do have the death penalty for this type crime, usually when accompanied by murder of the victim. As to why men get harsher sentences, more often than not, the crime is commited by the man, and is reported thusly. Regardless of who commits it, though--it is a sickness that needs to be addressed.

Answer 7

Wow! Lot of dumb stuff in a small area yet enable me attempt to provide you a reaction. a million) Administering the shortcoming of existence penalty procedure is about 600% more effective severe priced than existence imprisonment. 2) inner most prisons, like public ones, are one hundred% funded with taxpayer funds. there is not any different source of funding of route. 3) The lack of existence penalty isn't lengthy gone so it truly is going to be not easy to carry it decrease back. 32 states, the U. S. authorities and the U. S. protection rigidity all have the shortcoming of existence penalty. 18 states and the District of Columbia do no longer. Did you thoroughly pass 4th grade?

Answer 8

for all such offenders death is the only penalty

Answer 9

If anyone kills a child in a sexually motivated crime, they deserve to die for what they have done.

Answer 10

We are way too easy on those who decise to abuse children. Here is my answer to these people who abuse our loved ones
Sex Offender Legislation “Wish List”
1-GPS and lifetime supervision/treatment Law The failure of today's solutions regarding sexual offenders is because we are stuck in the strategy of “public notification” rather than “controlling offenders”. The current model puts the burden on parents rather than offenders, and makes the wrong people work to prevent abuse. Remotely (GPS) knowing where an offender is at all times throughout his lifetime can help to prevent that offender from creating new cases of sexual abuse.
2-Include all known offenders in the management plan-for life. It is wrong to include just those under supervision since the Meagan’s Law was written. People do not ever age out of this behavior so why an old is charge less important than a new charge. Sexual offences are the most under reported crimes (according to the FBI). The fact that a molester has not been arrested recently does not necessarily means he has not offended. In my opinion all offenders should be included in any plan, regardless of when their offense occurred. I believe some states have done this already.
3-Put all offenders , levels I, II or III on the website . I believe Florida does this. The leveling tool is very poor and pedophiles often end up with only a level I because they did not use force, and they superficially complied with treatment. The way the leveling system works pedophilic “groomers” who do not use force (and are the most busy of all offenders with hundreds of victims) are often not level III’s and therefore are able to have their offense relatively unknown. In New York for example offenders can lawyer up and reduce the “level” they get at their hearing. Molesters can assert they are “non violent”, “sober”, ect, and get the “points” reduced or get the judge to “override” the scale. Currently the public notification system is failing. All offenders of all levels should be on the website.
4- “Victim Shield Law”. As you know one of the few protections we offer rape victims is “Rape shield laws”, in order to at least try and prevent a rape victim’s sexual history from being put on trial rather than the rapist. In child sexual abuse cases there are no “Rape shield laws” to prevent the victim, or the victim’s family (often the mother) from being made the center of negative attention. In the past defense lawyers for rapists would portray rape victims as promiscuous, today child molester’s lawyers portray victims and victim’s mothers as manipulative, litigious, unreliable, angry, mentally ill, sociopathic, medicated, or undedicated. Because we as a society love to blame women, especially mothers, molesters have been able to harness the misogyny in our culture in order to escape responsibility for their offences. Like the old rape cases that would revolve around the victims sexual past, today molester cases revolve around a child or a mother’s real or fictional problems instead of the focus of attention being the sexual abuse committed by the offender. I do not know if there can ever be a “victim shield law” to prevent the victim/victim’s mother being put on trial rather than the molester, but I know it would help victims avoid being re-traumatized in the system and help society hold sexual offenders accountable. One of the things to always remember with offenders is they are control seekers, and will take any opportunity to attack rather than just defend. They feel entitled to their behavior and see being held accountable as an injustice they are being forced to suffer, and they have zero guilt in harming any number of people (even their children) in order to escape the consequences they deserve.
5-Plea deals down to “Endangering the welfare of a minor”. Despite the underlying behavior being the sexual abuse of children offenders are often given convictions that hide the nature of their behavior. When this happens offenders can get employment that gives them access to children, offenders are not on the State Sex Offender Registry. The other consequence to their being given non-sexual charges is that it cuts their supervision time in half. Misdemeanor sex offences carry 6 years probation supervision but “Endangering the welfare of a minor” carries only three. I feel the law should be changed so offenders cannot be given non-sexual abuse charges.
6-Make “Endangering the welfare of a minor” registerable , if the judge feels it was a sexually motivated crime. The registry is to narrow and limited as to what crimes can be registered. Laws be changed so “endangering the welfare of a minor” is registerable when the behavior or motivation was sexual.
7-“Standardized” conditions for those on sex offender probation. Right now offenders with good lawyers can get specific (or all) sex offender conditions removed from their sexual offender conditions of probation. This means that sexual offenders are on probation but are allowed to drink alcohol, work with children, have computers, go to bars, and do other things that will create a higher risk for the community. I feel there should be a “Statewide Sex Offender Conditions of Probation” that conditions cannot be removed from (but conditions can be added to suite the offenders issues).
8-Sexual Offender Contraband law- Strangely it is legal for sexual offenders off probation to own all kinds of things such as handcuffs, police lights, spy cameras, and software to make their internet behavior more anonymous.
9-Sex Offender use of technology law- When bank robbers use technology such as wearing body armor the penalties are increased, why are sex offender allowed to use any technology without added consequences. Offenders choose the internet because it allows greater access to children and greater anonymity. They should be punished for use of technology to harm a child. (technology such as Computers, digital cameras, webcams, ect)
10-“Secrecy Bind Law” The offender getting his victim to not report the crime he committed should be a separate crime that he suffers added consequences for. The pain that a victim suffers because the offender threatened, tricked, or manipulated the victim into silence should be seen as a separate and deserving of added consequences.
11- “Parental Alienation Syndrome” is a pseudo syndrome that is being used to get offenders off the hook by saying (incorrectly) that sexual abuse allegations come from a manipulative ex- playing head games with a child rather than because the child was actually molested. This “Parental Alienation Syndrome” is not a legitimate disorder, has not been subjected to peer review, has been ignored for 20 years by the APA, AMA, NASW, ECT because it is just a sophisticated way to say your wife is crazy and turned everyone against you. It is being pushed by hired guns such as Doctors, PhD’s, and lawyers to get their child molesting clients out of trouble. It is a favorite of the “Fathers Rights” groups who see men as victims of the Family Court system. By the way, these “Fathers rights” groups, “wrongly accused” groups, and “victims of allegations” groups are very organized and spend a good deal of time and energy networking and paying professionals. These angry, entitled molesters are organized and work hard, and I feel we need to work just as hard against them. My point is I feel we need some legislation to block this fake disorder from being used in court



The Myths and Truths about sexual offenders---The Myth::We can relax a bit now that we have sex offender registration.….The Truth Despite Megan's Law, the overall number of sex offenses occurring have actually increased, the websites can only do so much; we need GPS and lifetime probation to control this population. Currently we are failing to control them The Myth::Some Sex Offenders are not violent.….The Truth Non “Violent” Crimes such as molestation are just as traumatizing, and calling them “non-violent” is not in any way accurate. The Myth::Most sex offenders don’t have a lot of victims …The Truth Although 75% of sexual offenders were convicted of one offense, that just means they were only caught once, almost 100% of them have multiple victims. Many have been found to have hundreds when they were polygraphed on this question. The Myth::Most Sex Offenders were at one time abused as a child themselves, that’s why they do it.…The Truth Most "sex offenders" has never been sexually abused. In fact, offenders say this to appear less culpable for their crimes. When they are polygraph on this question their rates of being molested go way, way down, their rates are in fact close to the rest of us who are not molesting The Myth: :Sex.Offenders get serious punishment, and we don’t have to worry about them for years….The Truth They get revolving door sentences, if they even go to jail, and the vast majority do not, Offenders usually get probation, and even then sex offenders do not get GPS and lifetime probation(as they need to). Offenders quickly get back to a normal life while victims have lifetime consequences.The Myth::Sex Offenders are very controlled on probation or parole and cannot look for more victims. The Truth Offenders without GPS are on part time supervision, they are “good” while in the Probation officers eyesight for the weekly office visit. Offenders have all week to create more victims. Lifetime supervision with GPS would put society in charge. Currently offenders run the show, and this means more victims. The Myth:: Sex Offenders will grow old and out of this behavior.The Truth There is no “aging out” of offending. An offender has these desires and intentions for life. If they change it is to prevent being caught again. The Myth::Sex Offenders are all on the registry ….The Truth Sadly it’s very narrow and limited as to what crimes can be registered. Many offenders are given plea deals for non registerable crimes even though their actual behaviors were sexual offences. Laws must be changed so these “endangering the welfare of a minor” and other charges are registerable The Myth::Offenders friends and family support their recovery …..The Truth In realty the offender’s friends and family have denial regarding the offender’s full responsibility for his offense (they like to blame victims, police, DA ect). Offenders friends and family usually minimize the crime (he only touched her breast), and offenders friends and family often belittle rather than support the goals of supervision and treatment. Overall friends and family help the disorder rather than the offender who has it. Almost all of the time friends and family are working against the good of the community, although they may not know this. The Myth::The community is the main concern during the supervision process ….The Truth Actually, the current situation is budgets and offender rights are more important than community safety. The Myth::Offenders have to register immediately with local law enforcement. …..The Truth Sex offenders are often given up to 10 days to register upon moving in, or being employed within a state. Some states don’t require sex offenders visiting their state to register. Most states do not require sex offenders to register in advance of a move, they can move in and then inform. Getting a violation on a manipulative offender trying to beat the system is far too difficult. The Myth::Megan's Laws are consistent across the United States and protect the public equally. ….The Truth States laws vary, from only a 10-year registration without being put on the website to a more appropriate lifetime registration with community notification. (although registration is not supervision, and supervision without GPS is only 20 minutes a week of supervision) The Myth::Judges do not have discretion and have to give offenders the registration and probation terms that apply. …. The Truth In New York for example offenders can lawyer up and reduce the “level” they get at their hearing. Molesters can assert they are “non violent”, “sober”, ect, and get a level I or II and avoid the III that gets them posted on the website. Pushy lawyers advocating for the offender can get the Judges to change the sex offender conditions of probation as well, removing bans on child contact, allowing offenders to drink alcohol, own a softball team, and have computers, ect. Currently Judges have far too much leeway and offender’s attorneys use this to give the offender more freedoms that he then uses to act his sexual offences, even while on probation. Taking away judges discretion will allow society to determine the rules rather than the offender’s lawyer.