English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-22 10:43:04 · 11 answers · asked by Gen Im 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

Gen 10:6-14 -
That which is observable and improvable in these verses is the account here given of Nimrod, Gen_10:8-10. He is here represented as a great man in his day: He began to be a mighty one in the earth, that is, whereas those that went before him were content to stand upon the same level with their neighbours, and though every man bore rule in his own house yet no man pretended any further, Nimrod's aspiring mind could not rest here; he was resolved to tower above his neighbours, not only to be eminent among them, but to lord it over them. The same spirit that actuated the giants before the flood (who became mighty men, and men of renown, Gen_6:4), now revived in him, so soon was that tremendous judgment which the pride and tyranny of those mighty men brought upon the world forgotten. Note, There are some in whom ambition and affectation of dominion seem to be bred in the bone; such there have been and will be, notwithstanding the wrath of God often revealed from heaven against them. Nothing on this side hell will humble and break the proud spirits of some men, in this like Lucifer, Isa_14:14, Isa_14:15. Now,
I. Nimrod was a great hunter; with this he began, and for this became famous to a proverb. Every great hunter is, in remembrance of him, called a Nimrod. 1. Some think he did good with his hunting, served his country by ridding it of the wild beasts which infested it, and so insinuated himself into the affections of his neighbours, and got to be their prince. Those that exercise authority either are, or at least would be called, benefactors, Luk_22:25. 2. Others think that under pretence of hunting he gathered men under his command, in pursuit of another game he had to play, which was to make himself master of the country and to bring them into subjection. He was a mighty hunter, that is, he was a violent invader of his neighbours' rights and properties, and a persecutor of innocent men, carrying all before him, and endeavouring to make all his own by force and violence. He thought himself a mighty prince, but before the Lord (that is, in God's account) he was but a mighty hunter. Note, Great conquerors are but great hunters. Alexander and Caesar would not make such a figure in scripture-history as they do in common history; the former is represented in prophecy but as a he-goat pushing, Dan_8:5. Nimrod was a mighty hunter against the Lord, so the Septuagint; that is, (1.) He set up idolatry, as Jeroboam did, for the confirming of his usurped dominion. That he might set up a new government, he set up a new religion upon the ruin of the primitive constitution of both. Babel was the mother of harlots. Or, (2.) He carried on his oppression and violence in defiance of God himself, daring Heaven with his impieties, as if he and his huntsmen could out-brave the Almighty, and were a match for the Lord of hosts and all his armies. As if it were a small thing to weary men, he thinks to weary my God also, Isa_7:13.
II. Nimrod was a great ruler: The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Gen_10:10. Some way or other, by arts or arms, he got into power, either being chosen to it or forcing his way to it; and so laid the foundations of a monarchy, which was afterwards a head of gold, and the terror of the mighty, and bade fair to be universal. It does not appear that he had any right to rule by birth; but either his fitness for government recommended him, as some think, to an election, or by power and policy he advanced gradually, and perhaps insensibly, into the throne. See the antiquity of civil government, and particularly that form of it which lodges the sovereignty in a single person. If Nimrod and his neighbours began, other nations soon learned to incorporate under one head for their common safety and welfare, which, however it began, proved so great a blessing to the world that things were reckoned to go ill indeed when there was no king in Israel.
III. Nimrod was a great builder. Probably he was architect in the building of Babel, and there he began his kingdom; but, when his project to rule all the sons of Noah was baffled by the confusion of tongues, out of that land he went forth into Assyria (so the margin reads it, Gen_10:11) and built Nineveh, etc., that, having built these cities, he might command them and rule over them. Observe, in Nimrod, the nature of ambition. 1. It is boundless. Much would have more, and still cries, Give, give. 2. It is restless. Nimrod, when he had four cities under his command, could not be content till he had four more. 3. It is expensive. Nimrod will rather be at the charge of rearing cities than not have the honour of ruling them. The spirit of building is the common effect of a spirit of pride. 4. It is daring, and will stick at nothing. Nimrod's name signifies rebellion, which (if indeed he did abuse his power to the oppression of his neighbours) teaches us that tyrants to men are rebels to God, and their rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.

2006-07-22 10:48:08 · answer #1 · answered by BrotherMichael 6 · 0 2

LESSON FOUR

NIMROD AND BABYLON: THE BIRTH OF IDOLATRY

by Steve and Terri White

Genesis 10:8-12; Genesis 3:15; Genesis 11

After the flood Noah and his family repopulated the earth. Because the deluge did not eradicate sin, man’s sinful nature ran wild once again. At the same time, territories were overrun with wild beasts, turning against the inhabitants of the land. The battle of man against beast was hot and fearful, but in the midst of it, Nimrod, son of Cush, appeared as the 'knight in shining armor'. A "mighty hunter," Nimrod delivered the people from the fear of beasts. Hungry for power, though, he also emancipated man from the LORD.

Until Nimrod, mankind was governed by the patriarchal system where the heads of families heard from God and guided their individual tribes. Nimrod, more accurately a "mighty hunter against the LORD," usurped patriarchal rule, and crowned himself the first human king in all of history. Now man ruled instead of God.

2006-07-22 10:50:08 · answer #2 · answered by mom2all 5 · 0 0

According to the Bible, he was the son of Cush (1 Ch. 1:10). His name was derived from the Hebrew verb mahadh meaning "rebel". The Babylonian Talmud states: "Why, then, was he called Nimrod? Because he stirred up the whole world to rebel against His [God's] sovereignty." He was the founder and King of the first empire to come into existence after the flood of Noah's day and he distinguished himself as a mighty hunter in opposition to God.

2006-07-22 10:51:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He was a great warrior. So next time you call someone a Nimrod, you are really giving them a compliment. Think about that.

2006-07-22 10:49:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Nimrod is also the constellation Orion in the sky.
I don't know why the Greeks named him Orion.
but this can show just how back mythology through the stars can go.

2006-07-22 13:41:51 · answer #5 · answered by InquisitiveIAm 2 · 0 0

Son of Cush, grandson of Ham, (Ham-who was the son of Noah);The Babylonian hunter and traditional builder of Ninevah. Assyria is called "the land of Nimrod".

2006-07-22 10:47:55 · answer #6 · answered by Angel 4 · 0 0

Not sure myself but my great grandpa was named Nimrod and my great grandma was named Ethel. Hehehe

2006-07-22 11:33:16 · answer #7 · answered by hayaa_bi_taqwa 6 · 0 0

not in simple terms did he unfold language, yet so did the apostles. They have been given the skill to communicate in tongues, many left ROme to unfold the observe someplace else. There, they made disciples who found out the Latin language and later became apostles of Peter and Paul. additionally, the Bible leaves a lot counsel out of eastern Asia. in my view, i've got faith that there are relationships between the language of Babel and East Asia because of the fact of a few form of commerce. it could have been straight forward for his language to unfold to India, and for India's language to influance East Asia. yet, who is conscious? God is conscious ultimate.

2017-01-03 09:23:35 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The Bible says he was "A mighty hunter before the Lord".

2006-07-22 10:52:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Started out as a human man who became king... People started worshipping him...and then his wife and son... We know him now as baal, and his wife was the beginning of mother worship..we see that now as Mary worship in the Catholic Church...the worship of Mary and baby Jesus...the equivalent of Baal's wife and son worshipped in the days of the OT. It all goes to the idea of man shall become God...which can't happen..the job is already taken.

2006-07-22 10:51:04 · answer #10 · answered by indiebaptist 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers