English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

sue

2006-07-22 10:03:36 · answer #1 · answered by MOGLE 3 · 2 2

What would we do before it was considered endangered? Absolutely nothing. It would just be some animal eating some plant. I'm glad there are people who try to care of endangered species, but sometimes too much involvement is a bad thing. If you went around trying to control every event that occurred that would be deemed dangerous to this or that one then you would have to control nearly all aspects of life. Everything on Earth affects all living things in some way and to try to control all these occurrences is foolish and arrogant. There is a plethora of animal and plant species that have gone extinct without our help. It's amazing that anything occurred without human involvement, right? We can control some things, but not most things and that's the way it should be. So to answer the question, let it chow down and let the pieces fall where they may.

2006-07-22 17:32:10 · answer #2 · answered by Johnny Z 1 · 0 0

They're probably both endangered because of environmental stress and human encroachment (I think killing would fall under encroachment.) So maybe the endangered animal would normally eat the endangered plant but it's endangered because the plant is endangered (like panda bears don't have huge stands of bamboo to eat anymore in China--bamboo isn't really endangered, but there aren't big forests of it anymore.) The animal's endangered! Let it eat what it wants.

Are you trying to be funny? Cuz this question strikes me as less than sincere. Stop making fun of environmental issues--it's bad karma to act like a twit.

2006-07-22 17:15:59 · answer #3 · answered by SlowClap 6 · 0 0

I would do nothing. Nature always wins , or fixes itself. The animal would eliminate the plant by obvious means,and hopefully excrete seeds or some part of the plant which would then reproduce itself.

2006-07-22 17:13:43 · answer #4 · answered by hollyltstarfleet 4 · 0 0

it would have been best to stop the animal from eating the plant but in this case, if there is nobody responsible for the action of the animal as in keeper or stuffs like that, just keep the animaal safe, no one is crucified.

2006-07-22 17:06:10 · answer #5 · answered by ay. 3 · 0 0

Nothing. Is the ciiiiiiircle of life. Didn't you watched Lion King?

2006-07-22 17:04:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

your head explodes from the paradox.

and a serious answer would be nothing it's the way nature is.

2006-07-22 17:03:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

um let it slide cuz thats the way the cookie crumbles

2006-07-22 17:05:33 · answer #8 · answered by spuds_316 3 · 0 0

Man, you really got us all stumped on that one!

2006-07-22 17:02:35 · answer #9 · answered by i_troll_therefore_i_am 4 · 0 0

Shoot 'em both.

2006-07-22 17:11:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers