which is better history or science?

Answer 1

Whats better M&M's Plain or Peanut?

Oh oo, oh... What about Almond?

Answer 2

science can unlock most of the answers in the universe however I didn't enjoy it much as a kid but history is way cool. I'm trying to do a study on Michigan history for fun and some of the things I've read about the local natives and how Michigan got it's name it means BIG TURTLE because if you look at it the lower part anyway from a certain point in the upper penninsula it looks like a Big turtle sticking his head out of the water.

Answer 3

I prefer History, although I teach Science!

Answer 4

science and history are both useful but personally I like science :)

Answer 5

hi alyssa, ur question is quite difficult to answer.. becoz both the subjects has its own good and bad.. like to say about history the advantage is its a study of worldly happenings and wat had happened. here u need to know the story of every historians.. the advantage is that u could study the subject as a story and can easily remember it as it has no technical or scientific names or terms.. the disadvantage is the years which u should remember and also the story of every historians as u could be confused.. to say about science its also an interesting subject.. the advantage is u could study easily if u understand the concept and u dont need to know all stories as u can bring up a conclusion if u know the concept.. the disadvantage is when u dont know the basics and concept.. science is difficult if u dont know the basics of it.. so now u decide yourself for a better one.. u have ur own answer.. good luck..

Answer 6

Jacqueline Carey's Kushiel series. in reality 2 trilogies of unusual commerce historic previous - set in an determination Renaissance Europe the position each component is the similar. . . diverse than that Christianity did now no longer grab on, and a diverse faith is the only accurate one. So on the similar time, each component is diverse! certainly epic. (be conscious: also certain at circumstances). Jules Watson's The White Mare & The first light Stag - fable/commerce historic previous duo about Scotland initiating in 79AD, even as Britain grew to develop into into inspite of the actuality that Roman... and Rome necessary Scotland. and for the reason that like the Dresden information, a pair diverse city fable authors you ought to take exhilaration in: Kelley Armstrong (start up with Bitten, some woman werewolf), Patrica Briggs (start up with Moon noted as, which starts off the coyote-woman's tale), and Charlaine Harris (lighter, better humourous, inspite of the undeniable shown actuality that better geared in the direction of ladies people i imagine of - some telepathic cocktail waitress who finally finally ends up deep interior the supernatural international.)

Answer 7

I think science is better because i like science its is fun for me you should like science better.

Answer 8

I always liked science better (always got better grades in it) but history is more beneficial.

Answer 9

I think they are both equal.

Scientific discoveries make history.
If it wasn't for science - history would be awfully boring

If it wasn't for history - no one would remember who did what or when.

Answer 10

i like science.