Please prove to me that home sexuality is wrong, without using the Bible?

Question

I have always wanted to see the arguments against homosexuality, without the Bible backing up those arguments. Unfortunately the Bible as a source is not infallible, and I cant take an answer seriously if it doesnt have any other sources.

I find it so amusing that the only "argument" besides God said so, is reproduction. The motive for sex should not always be the formation of life. The few homosexuals that do engage in that type of lifestyle, do not threaten our whole population. As for the whole argument of it being immoral, who can without sounding completely pious, define morals for a species?

Answer 1

There is nothing wrong with it and anyone who tries to prove otherwise is going to give you answers with no basis in fact. To prove it to yourself (that there is nothing wrong with it) try and match every answer on here to some kind of definitive scientific proof that it is wrong. You won't find any.

If that's not enough others are going to call it morally wrong. Well who's morals are we talking about? Everyone has different morals based on their own life experiences (religion, parents, etc.) so you're dealing with their baggage.

Answer 2

What then would you choose as a valid source to use as an argument for or against anything? You say "unfortunately the Bible as a source is not infallable." Also you cannot take an answer seriously if it doesn't have any other sources.
I will assume by "home sexuality" you mean HOMOSEXUALITY and not home sexuality, for even though I have seen some homes that could be veiwed as sexy esthetically speaking, I can't recall a homes sexuality ever being questioned as to do so seems kinda weird, or what the english language at one time called Queer...Ha ha.
Under your first premise that you have always wanted to see arguments against homosexuality I believe you are self deceived and are prejudiced against any such argument being valid or having merit or you would not place restrictions on what would be acceptable as a source regardless of its alleged infallibilty if it demonstrates a postulate contrary to your ambitions.
Experience and history has proven the Bible infallible but that will be overlooked as a source at your insistence.
You cannot take an answer seriously, that much can be known by your criteria, the number of sources notwithstanding.
So having laid down your authoritative judgements against any arguments of virtue I would question your right to a serious answer at all as absurd. You yourself admit to the idea that their is a standard to which we hold to in passing judgement upon authoritative literature. Which underlying moral code is it that permits you to make such judgements? Is it your own? Where did you get it? You infer a right and wrong, who made the code whereby you get such an idea? Who is the moral lawgiver? Is it anything goes? Can a pedophile abuse a child because he refuses to accept biblical mandates? If we all make our own rules regarding moral conduct then whose moral law reigns supreme? There can be no right or wrong without a law to dtermine which is which otherwise wrong is not wrong and right is not right. They are merely different choices without value. A world without Values is not a world that can survive itself. Sex was made for procreation and whether or not I use the bible does not change the fact that man plus man, or woman plus woman will never equal child. Society has advanced because of the union of man and woman into posterity. Someone (gee I wonder who that could've been) made it pleasurable and bound within a contractual agreement known as marriage. Without common sense and the ability to recognize truth (God's Word) society as we know it crumbles.

Answer 3

If you don't have a moral guide such as the bible then how would you define that anything would be right or wrong? Murder, child molestation, rape, stealing, etc.. would all be ok.
Despite modern day standards sex isn't just for fun. Sex was intended for producing offspring. You say that you can't take an answer seriously without other sources but you don't want to use the bible because it "is not infallible". What is a reliable source of information then, a web page?


So to quote another answer that states the obvious "you put your wang in a butt hole that has **** in it, nuf said" there ya have it.

Answer 4

Homosexuality is a disease like cystic fibrosis, albinism, and other genetically linked diseases. The only problem it relates to our morals and sexuality. Basically there is nothing wrong with possessing a genetic disease. The only problem is trying to force the disease on society to make the consequences seem correct. Humans and other animals pretty much require heterosexuality for the survival of the species. Evolution requires that a species be able to reproduce successfully. Homosexuals can't do that. I don't care how much they try they just are not compatible in the plumbing areas. I truly believe that within the next 10 years they will find a definite link between homosexuality and genetics. When that happens all this crap that is going on right now about lifestyles, morals and religion will all disappear.

Answer 5

I really think you have it. That is the only source I have ever seen. They don't hurt me and I always tell my fag bashing friends that if they weren't gay then there would be some nice, sensitive guy with his girlfriend and not him, so he should be thankful they are gay.

ascarta2
"you put your wang in a butt hole that has **** in it, nuf said"

My wife's back door is pretty clean really. thanks for that though.

Beki has given you the only logical argument so far, but with modern science that isn't the case. The weak live all the time, and with all the overpopulation in the world, is that a good thing?

shadowofears
"more than 80% of AIDS cases are due to homosexuality"

Hello idiot. I knew someone was going to bring aids up. It is easier to transmit it through anal sex. that's all. I don't see it rampant in the Lesbian community. They are homosexuals too.

I'm enjoying all the bible thumping quotes, by the way. Some people just can't help themselves.

And to all the people saying it is against nature, GAY PENGUINS.

Answer 6

There are two different sexes for a reason. If men were meant to be with men and women with women there would be just men or just women. Oh yes and think about the anatomical differences in a man and a woman. Think about the appearance and personalities of a man or a woman.Think about this the human race would not multiply there would be just two people on this earth right now.
It's my opinion. You asked. I am answering. I believe all of those things points to the fact that homosexuality is unnatural
But if that is what someone chooses, then that's none of my business. As long as they keep to themselves, I don't care. That's what free agency is about.

Answer 7

Nature made sex feel good so we would want to do it continue the existence of the species. In order for man, as a weaker, slower animal, to survive, nature also gave us the physiological abilities of logical and creative thought. Unfortunately, this has led to to the existence, creation, and rationalization of mental problems. The real reason that people started calling homosexuality a "life style" choice and came up with this XY justification baloney is that they don't want to have to deal with something that is so physiologically disgusting. "It's OK. Just go do it some place else."

Answer 8

As mentioned in previous answers, the only 'wrong ' thing about it is the continuation of the species, however there is a theory that states homosexuality is actually a sign of a healthy poulation and is natures way of keeping the population from overcrowding, as homosexuality in nature is very common, and most often found in species that aren't close to extinction.

Answer 9

"home" sexuality is ok, a good place to keep it, "homosexuality" is not ok

SIMPLE, two sexes are created for a reason, if homosexuality were ok why not just have one sex walking around? It's against the laws of NATURE. However, if someone wants to do something that they know in their heart and mind is wrong they will justify it and validate it with any argument they can. (Human nature)

Answer 10

There is no proof against homosexuality anywhere else. I mean, where would one look? In the dictionary? The periodic table of the elements? I don't think there is any mathematical theorem or something like that to "prove" homosexuality is wrong.

As for "home sexuality," however, which you mention in your question's title--that has been proven wrong in the book "Absolute Proof That Exhibiting Sexuality in Your Own Home Is Indubitably Wrong." Check on amazon.com.

Answer 11

There's nothing wrong with "home sexuality" between a husband and wife. My husband and I do it at home. If you're talking about "homosexuality," that's another story. Unfortunately, you don't seem to be willing to accept an answer based on the truth, so I cannot give you a truthful answer.