Yes there is some published evidence they are arming the insurgents and building ties with the extremist within Iraq. All we can do is control the border between the two.
2006-07-22 06:53:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
i think of i stated this someplace else on yahoo, yet i don't have self belief that this sectarian violence will end each time quickly. it gets plenty worse in the previous it gets any greater effective. that is only the easy certainty of the undertaking. a lot of human beings have criticized me for asserting that Iraq isn't a state and not a u . s ., yet i firmly have self belief this. there replaced into no Iraq in the previous the 1920's and there isn't any reason to have self belief (and no indication) that a real national Iraqi identification has been shaped in this short volume of time. 80 years isn't an prolonged time, incredibly in an historic region like Mesopotamia. The Kurds could have their own state. they'll could desire to paintings out the final borders of that state and the undertaking of Kirkuk and all that, yet as quickly because it somewhat is settled (if that is settled peacefully) then Iraq would be greater effective off. the actual violence in spite of the fact it somewhat is between Sunnis and Shiites. The animosity between those 2 Muslim sects is long and deep and could no longer end for the foreseeable destiny, if ever. enable somebody (dare i say the USA of a) draw up a border between the two factors and create an fairly loose confederacy that helps the Sunni factors to get various the oil wealth. it somewhat is approximately it. i do no longer see any incorrect thank you to end the sectarian violence. The violence brought about via Muslim extremists and jihadists is a distinctive count and greater often than not restricted to Sunnis.
2016-12-10 12:16:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no they're not. They support a few shiite organizations who then engage in sectarian violence, but to say that Iran is behind it is inaccurate. If anything, Iran wants the violence to end, so the US will leave, and then Iran can try to manipulate the Siite-dominated government of Iraq.
2006-07-22 07:01:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Charles D 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Iran is not directly causing the violence in Iraq. There are a lot of non Iraq fighters as well as home grown terrorists. These individuals are driven by hate for nonmuslim's occupying Iraq.
2006-07-22 06:57:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kenneth H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Al-Qaeda is. Everyone knows that Saddam and Osama were tight.
Iran has a hand in Hezbollah's actions. We should have focused on Iran long before Iraq.
2006-07-22 06:52:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes the Iranian government conducts all these nasty things and I doubt if anybody can do anything to the government except making the situation worse for the people.
2006-07-22 06:58:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by P J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Exactly what we are doing, applying pressure, hopefully get a UN resolution aginst them for the nuclear buildup, if nothing else keep our troops right where they are, and continue to help the internal revolution they are suffering from.
2006-07-22 06:53:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by tm_tech32 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe the invaders are the cause of the violence we see in iraq today.
2006-07-22 06:57:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by punchface 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
All the U.S. did was obliterate any trace of law and order upon arrival so.....yes it's probably the Iranians.
2006-07-22 06:56:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by phoephus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋