Could a rolled up newspaper be considered a weapon of mass destruction?

Question

I've killed about 5 flies with it so far today. Will George Bush drop 10 ton bombs on my house? I was just trying to defend myself.

Answer 1

Maybe not a rolled up paper but a read mainstream media newspaper (New York Times/LA Times/Washington Post) certainly does qualify as a weapon of mass distraction.

Answer 2

Can a rolled up newspaper be considered a weapon of mass destruction by the Bush administration? That all depends if it is an election year or not. If it is NOT an election year, I am sure you can walk around with a nuclear missile strapped to your back and the Department of Homeland Insecurity will not pay any attention to you. During an election year if you even pass gas, and are on the opposing end of the political spectrum, you will be deemed a terrorist and you will be accused of proliferating biological weapons of mass destruction.

Answer 3

You are just hilarious, not. We could only hope that Bush would drop at least one bomb on your house. Idiots like you we do not need.

Answer 4

Dear BrainHurts,
Saddam had WMDs. We saw thousands of dead Kurdish people on the mountainside where he gassed them. He has never offered proof that he destroyed the WMDs. He would not let inspectors in for 4 years.
Do the math.

Answer 5

He will not get any argument from the fly community.

Answer 6

Dumb 2 points

Answer 7

Only if oil is involved.

Answer 8

Only if you are a fly.

Answer 9

http://www.ubrfvideo.com/goldranger/shut_up.gif

Answer 10

I see why you call yourself "my brain hurts". No, wait, your name should be "I don't have a brain".