Germany just before World War II and how they were using the Jews as a scapegoat for all there Societal problems.
2006-07-21
19:35:51
·
31 answers
·
asked by
Captain Patriot
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
Sentiment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Look up Sentiment in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Sentiment can refer to:
* feelings and emotions
* the literary device sentimentality, which is used to induce an emotional response disproportionate to the situation, and thus to substitute heightened and generally unthinking feeling for normal ethical and intellectual judgment
2006-07-21
19:42:02 ·
update #1
"Some Americans"
And AMERICA IS A GREAT COUNTRY AND I WOULD LIKE IT TO STAY THAT WAY.
bUT DON'T LIKE THE PATH IT IS TAKING.
2006-07-21
19:43:42 ·
update #2
If you don't understand the question you should be trying to answer it.
2006-07-21
19:44:58 ·
update #3
some of yall don't understand the question so next time i'll try and use smaller words.
2006-07-21
19:48:20 ·
update #4
Some American's do have this sentiment, not all, of course.
Why were the Jews being hunted down? They prospered and were taking over important institutions in Germany such as banking. They were seen as outsiders and a threat to German culture. They were compared to rats, as I see the same comparisons here.
The German people also play a role, for many were racists and part of their culture. They did believe in a super human race, even before Hilter entered the picture.
The Jews were dehumanized by the German govt and all of there privileges were been taken away, one by one. I think since most illegals are poor and indigent, with no real representation, they are a very easy target. I hear many on this board dehumanizing illegals, as if they were sub human. I certainly do see parallels....There are better ways to deal with poor people just seeking a living here. We can start with humanity....
2006-07-22 13:33:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Oh boy - you're going to get a lot people upset with you because you dared to compare America with Nazi Germany. That is truly a sin.
Seriously, it is unfortunately a part of the human capacity to assign blame to some scapegoat, and I think you are right, that most Americans are looking only at the symptom of the problem, rather than the causes.
Next time I think you can make your point without resorting to subtly calling American's Nazi's.
2006-07-21 19:53:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chris H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although i do not like any kind of patriots...
The Nazi is, as the word says in a proper translation... a nationalist. And Germany did not put the Patent on the rights to be a nationalist. The German Nazis seem to be very popular evil power across Americans, although it's over 60 years back, since then so many horrible things happened and still are happening. How comes you do not mention any recent example, are you hanging behind?
Back to your question, putting a label on any human, in any form, is misjudgment.
To call any human ILLEGAL is simply nonsense, based on, created by bureaucracy, artificial identification of human beings with a peace of plastic, or paper.
Feeling superior towards other nationalities is misjudgment based on excessive nationalism, Minority or Oedipus's complex, and simply stupidity.
And it reminds me more on the 50 years old country, called Israel... they came as guests, but became conquerors. Destroyed Palestrina, and now are blaming and fighting them, cuz they try to survive... in their own country.
2006-07-21 20:56:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by zaraza 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I think you've got some similarities there. I also think that the Israelis are behaving the way the Nazis did with their neighbors.
But right now, the USA govt. is using the concept of "terrorism" as their excuse for eroding liberties, ignoring the laws, misrepresenting the sentiments of the people, and in general just ignoring our society's real problems.
2006-07-21 19:51:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Me-as-a-Tree 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There you go, yep just the other day I was touring the concentration camps we are building for all the Mexicans. Complete with poison gas showers and huge ovens for body cremation.
With the technology we have now, we figure we can kill off 20million in a few months.
You caught us, yep we just want to slaughter millions of Mexicans, such a smart guy you are.
2006-07-21 19:39:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by tm_tech32 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No not Americans. You do have a point, but I don't think you can understand what it is. Last time I tried to explain it I got alot of people mad, even the ones on my side.
But the true answer is no, we are not Nazi's. La Raza - the Master Race - Now that sounds like a Nazi to me.
2006-07-22 02:43:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by yars232c 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm a Republican who takes position to have a liberal view on immigration. in case you favor people tochronic the speed reduce and by no skill 5 to ten mph over, you need to implement that prompt - not all of sudden turn round and retroactively hand out thousands of tickets and droop all and distinctive's license for what we've all been doing for a lengthy time period. that is an unwritten settlement that even inspite of the actuality that technically unlawful, the law enforcement officials are going to allow you smash out with going a touch over the speed reduce. we were lax on imposing unlawful immigration and appeared any opposite direction. it really is a lot a lot less stressful to exhibit people away on the border or deport them once their visa expires than to throw them overseas even as they have been right here for most, many years and outfitted a life right here. finally, we favor to look after the border and to make certain who's right here. in the experience that they don't look to be criminals, i don't have a difficulty with a pathway to citizenship - and that i have no favor to squeeze those people like many different conservatives look to experience is critical. so a techniques as "jumping the line", the project there is that there is a line in any respect. Our criminal immigration equipment is so screwed up that that is backing up those who should be able to enter and make a contribution to the rustic. All of it somewhat is in basic terms context... to respond to your question, I nevertheless don't have a difficulty with the time period. The "unlawful" in "unlawful immigrant" denotes status - an similar way we've "unmarried people" and "married people". it really is a factually precise ongoing status. The time period has not something to do with race or racism. There are white unlawful immigrants too. How is the framing incorrect? in basic terms because i'm not large on punishment for a criminal offense we weren't properly imposing would not advise they don't look to be finally in charge and in charge for his or her own moves. so a techniques as employers, interior the previous many have not properly-known (or somewhat frankly tried now to not understand) no matter if their workers were unlawful or not. For those you are able to instruct knowingly employed "unlawful immigrants", I even haven't any project calling them "unlawful employers" both. bypass ahead and upload that to the lexicon.
2016-12-10 13:23:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not hardly. All countries have immigration laws. Why is only America guilty of genocide for enforcing them?
2006-07-21 20:02:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not at all. The Jews were legal citizens of Germany. Not the same thing, at all.
2006-07-21 19:39:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I understand your question and do not agree with the comparison.
Allow me to illustrate;
Apples to Oranges
2006-07-22 12:51:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by C B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋