English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am a nurse and this is a touchy situation for me.I just had surgery so I'm on light duty for now so I have been doing private duty at hospitals.The hospital I was at today had alot of women H.I.V positive,and knew it b4 they concieved.And I ask them why would they do this and some of them got pissed with me some called me stuck up.I meant no harm,and I asked nicely.Why would they pass this down.Some of them told me they wre lonely,you would'nt believe the responses they gave me.Was I wrong for this?

2006-07-21 15:30:38 · 17 answers · asked by dccuttie75 6 in Pregnancy & Parenting Other - Pregnancy & Parenting

17 answers

I agree! I work in the medical field as well, and there have been a few mom's who have been HIV positive for nearly 20 years and have just recently had their baby about 1 year ago.

I don't have the nerve to ask them why they went ahead and had sexual relations, when they knew what the risks were if they became pregnant.

My theory? They just don't care.

2006-07-21 15:35:55 · answer #1 · answered by afanofnataliewood 3 · 2 1

Honey, 50/50 is for genetics, no longer sickness transmission. Plus, HIV/AIDS isn't a similar component. HIV is a plague, and after the HIV virus has had sufficient time to negatively result the immune equipment, the guy develops AIDS. after all, there is an major probability that a newborn ought to get HIV from residing with an contaminated mom in only on a daily basis existence issues. there's a probability (besides the actuality that a lot smaller) that the youngster ought to get HIV because they were given contaminated blood faster or later. there's a probability that the youngster ought to finally end up with some thing else painful and terminal, like progeria or leukemia. also, the youngster may or received't advance as a lot as be with no be certain - there are people talked about as 'lengthy-time period non-progressors' who've HIV for decades, notwithstanding it under no circumstances develops into AIDS so that they stay like all usual man or woman. If no longer, there are countless frustrating judgements a mom may might want to make, from what drugs to take even as pregnant to a thanks to acceptable minimise the opportunity of passing it on to their newborn. for my section, i imagine that is a foul theory, notwithstanding it is the girl's determination, and her duty to bypass about this VERY intently if she chooses to take action.

2016-10-15 01:43:32 · answer #2 · answered by sandeep 4 · 0 0

I am not HIV positive but if I were asked this question yes I would be infuriated! I have delivered two healthy babies before and I felt judged by half the nurses that took care of me. I cant imagine having a disease that many people feel shameful about and being judged. Yes I would be mad. I am a funeral director, and half the time I dont know how the deceased that I am taking care of died until we get the death certificate, what you did would be the equivalent of me asking the grieving husband AND HOW DID YOUR WIFE DIE?

2006-07-21 16:49:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not morally wrong, no. But professionally, it might not be productive.

I mean, its too late now, number one. Also, you could use the same reasoning to scold lung cancer patients for smoking or heart patients for being obese. Its too late, they made poor choices, the damage is done, and now there is a problem. Thats why most people are there at the hospital.

I would wager the pregnancies weren't 100% planned, just a result of unprotected sex (same as the HIV).

Is it thoughtless? yes. Irresponsible? definitely. But is it your place to go scold everybody?

your job as a nurse is to educate people, if they ask for or need it. But it seems like chastising someone after the fact is counterproductive. It will cause the patients to get angry with you, and once they are angry the communication will break down and it will be harder to work with them from there on. Also, if they complain to your superiors or the hospital it might cause problems for you.

I would be like you, and curious why they did it. I am almost positive it was just that they kept having unprotected sex with no thought whatsoever about the consequences of their actions.

I get just as angry about women who do drugs while pregnant. Believe it or not, I asked one girl why she did cocaine while pregnant. Her response was, she did it with all her other kids and they turned out FINE.
Talk to the hand.

You just can't reason with people .THey know when they do wrong, but they will just be bitter when you confront them about it.

2006-07-21 15:42:05 · answer #4 · answered by ivehadit 4 · 0 0

No you are just curious, but I mean some people who are HIV Positive do still want children and some might be hoping that a cure is near. Also the pregnancies may not have been intentional in all cases.

I think most are just hoping a cure is near and want children of their own and adopting is not only near impossible for someone with an HIV status but not enough for some people as having their own child.

2006-07-21 15:36:03 · answer #5 · answered by Crazy Mama 5 · 0 0

There are several drugs out there in today's world, that prevent the fetus from contracting HIV from it's mother. It's really not all that unusual any longer. I don't know that I would do so, but I would imagine if a doctor told me that it was safe I could be swayed to make the decision.

2006-07-21 15:37:16 · answer #6 · answered by Mary J 4 · 0 0

You should not be asking them these questions. It's not your business. You need to treat the patient as best you can without making judgments.

I don't mean that these people should not be educated, but this is not the time. They need non-judgmental education on how not to pass HIV on to their babies. Proper pre-natal care can minimize the risks of exposure, and so can proper care of their baby after birth.

2006-07-21 15:35:07 · answer #7 · answered by Becca 5 · 0 0

It is called attempted murder if one partner knowingly has sex with someone if they knew they were HIV+ and don't tell the other person.Murder if the person dies from the HIV.

So why isn't it attempted murder when a woman who is HIV+ conceives a child and gives birth to the child?

2006-07-21 17:30:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree with "Optimistic" . There should be a law.

I disagree with "Becca"....Yes it is her business. It is all of our business. Maybe with someone asking the ignorant...it will make them relalize their wrong doing to the child and not have another.

Remember the saying....."It takes a village to raise a child".

It takes the same 'village' to save the child.

2006-07-21 15:41:10 · answer #9 · answered by COOKIE 5 · 0 0

Because really, everyone has the right to reproduce. Personal feelings aside, you shouldn't have asked them that. I'm sure they know the risks, and obviously they didn't care- it's not your place as their nurse to second guess them. You're there to help them thru this.

2006-07-21 15:36:08 · answer #10 · answered by jamieinreno 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers