English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All these talk about illegals, rallies, stupid questions, and answers, deportations, and still nothing being done about illegal empoyers. How much money is it going to take for employers to stop hiring illegals?

2006-07-21 14:23:44 · 15 answers · asked by elperro 3 in Politics & Government Immigration

HahahahahahahahahahahahaMuahahahahaMuahahahahaMuahahahahah!!!!!!!!

2006-07-21 14:30:15 · update #1

I'm sorry DAR, it is this simple. It was done in the Nebraska meatpackers. The meatpackers had more muscle than the INS. It is this simple.

2006-07-21 14:33:08 · update #2

15 answers

To evaluate the success of Vanguard, we would have had to go through two or three cycles," said Jerry Heinauer, an Omaha immigration official who helped launch the pilot program in late 1998. "It never really made it through one cycle."

Vanguard was sidelined last summer when the Social Security Administration, citing privacy concerns, objected to the Immigration and Naturalization Service's plan to continually mine Social Security records in search of questionable workers. The political tide began to turn even before that, though, as employers, livestock producers and labor unions joined advocates for immigrants in attacking the operation as unfairly targeting the meatpacking industry and Latinos


Vanguard wasn't done. There are more than enough ways to get people to work. In florida, I worked at a low paying job that needed 1,000 workers right away. They filled those jobs with legal citizens in a month in Tampa, not in the boondocks either.

When you do something like that, they set it up to fail - the plants. When THEY need 1,000 workers without a legal test involved, you can be damn sure they will get them.

2006-07-21 15:16:58 · answer #1 · answered by yars232c 6 · 1 1

Keep on laughing.

I think you underestimate the power of the citizens of the US. Let's just play a game here.
Lets say illegals are allowed to stay and employers are then required to pay them at least minimum wage.
Prices will rise dramatically of course. But with the majority of this country demanding that illegals be deported and processed as legal citizens, I suspect we'll boycott companies in massive numbers.
So, laugh if you will. But be forewarned that you just might be laughing out of the other side of your face, waiting for the day laborer truck that will never show up because the company no longer exists.
Enjoy your life under the over pass along with the rest of our poor and homeless. Heck, you might even be sharing a blanket with your former boss.

2006-07-21 14:37:12 · answer #2 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0 0

If HR4437 becomes law, employers who hire illegals will go to jail. Since the senate bill is dead in the water and immigration is so hot as a political issue, I think it is likely that HR4437 will be made into law as a way of securing the positions of many people in the house currently, before November.

2006-07-21 14:35:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are right that that is the hard question, but only one hard question. Employment is only one magnet. When you are next door to a country that does not educate its poor people, universal education is definitely another. I am not sure what to do about it, but to think employment is the only draw is too simple.

We can't really enforce against employers until we get a data base of who is here legally so employers can check who is and isn't against it. So employers fight creation of the database, and say 'how can I be held responsible, these forgeries are so good!'

We need many pieces to be in place.

2006-07-21 14:29:36 · answer #4 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 0

Why should want to, when in reality they want do anything, as it is, America is not even enforcing it's immigration laws, rarely do they even enforce work place immigration laws and the fines are a joke. Until America gets serious and starts enforcing existing laws on the books not much is going to be done.The greatest country in the world is also the most helpless country in the world when it comes to immigration

2006-07-21 15:08:20 · answer #5 · answered by Zoe 4 · 0 0

Most employers that hire illegals are immigrants that became legal, so they hire people that started off just like them. Think about it, they also need to feed their families

2006-07-21 15:12:28 · answer #6 · answered by skdfjasl 2 · 0 0

HeeHeeHeeHeeHeeHeeHeeHeeHeeHeeHee....

EZ question LP--no EZ answer. There are many problemas in catching illegals or the employers.

The greatest one is, "How are illegals identified without infringing our Constitutional rights?"

The Constitution will allow for crime to continue in our society rather than impede on our rights.

That's the way it is, Amigo.

2006-07-21 14:44:44 · answer #7 · answered by Capt Jack 2 · 0 0

They aren't going to stop hiring them, they need the cheap labor and when they employ illegals they don't have to follow the rules themselves because the illegals can't exactly report them to labor and industry now can they?

2006-07-21 14:26:45 · answer #8 · answered by dappersmom 6 · 0 0

I don't know but I sure wouldn't hire an immigrant even if it was cheaper for me. I rather collect them all and bring them to ins and watch them scatter

2006-07-21 14:30:09 · answer #9 · answered by cutiepie81289 7 · 0 0

I can only say it goes both ways--if they were 'not here' (like they are suppose not to be here by law) the problem wouldn't exist at all for the employers.
Chuckle-giggle

2006-07-21 14:51:59 · answer #10 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers