Nothing that George W. Bush has done as president has been his own idea. He is surrounded by people who are more intelligent and evil than he is, he is a puppet, the name Bush has carried alot of respect after his father's presidency, hence the "power behind the throne" chose little George as their pawn. It would be easier to get the public behind another George Bush than a Dick Cheney.
He would have the same opinion on everything as his priest tells him to have, he is a weak-minded sheep that simply does as he's told.
2006-07-21 15:20:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by DrewBoy 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
The president is the leader of the nation not The Ruler!
1.The death penalty is justice not killing for no cause.
2. Federal spending does not restrict stem cell research it just makes it a state and private funded venture!
3. Tens of thousands were killed under Saddam, he just made it a free country.
4. New Orleans is a city not a nation. The state and City have more jurisdiction than the President! that is why we have local officials. America is suppose to be ruled by the people. This is not the main job of the federal government, that is a local job.
5. Yes the terrorist 9/11 plot was a known Potential problem. There are many potential plots.
However, Bush reacted, he did not lob a missile at a camp he tried to end the problem.
Anymore?
2006-07-21 14:34:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by happymrzot 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only time the shrub is pro-life is when it comes to abortion.
In ANY other situation, he are pro-death.
He is more worried about the non-life of a few cells than he is about all the lives he has murdered, sent to their deaths in war, doomed to death for lack of research, and neglected to death by allowing 9-11 and new Orleans disasters.
I have determined that he doesn't even care about those cells . I believe he has just chosen this battle to make his far right religious voters happy.
I'm gonna bet if one of his precious daughters ended up pregnant by some sleaze ball, the entire family would insist that she get rid of the baby so that she didn't have to raise a bastard child.
2006-07-21 14:42:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dustin Lochart 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's take these on 1 at a time
Approves of the death penalty- Executing convicted murderers after they have been through an exhaustive appeals process, keeps the rest of us safe. Criminals often receive plea bargains based on their cooperation in order to get life sentences instead of the death penalty. Because of this cooperation other criminals are taken off the streets and everyone else can enjoy a greater level of safety.
President Bush is a strong advocate FOR adult stem cell research. ADULT stem cell is the type that is actually making progress and helping people. People with spinal cord injuries similar to Christopher Reeves are regaining gross motor functions through ADULT stem cell therapy. If the man of steel had put his energy into promoting ADULT stem cell research, instead of diverting it to embryonic stem cell research, he may have lived. Embryonic stem cell research has never even been tested on humans. In lab animals it has been one failure after another.
Allowed tens of thousands to fie in Iraq--- Iraqis allowed a madman to rule them. The same type of people who blame us for killing Iraqis, and say we should not have got our selves involved never seem to have an answer for why the Iraqi people did not overthrow their own government. Someone had to bring about change. If not them, us.
Warned about New Orleans- No one on this earth was warned about this potential disaster more than the people of New Orleans themselves. What did they do about it? Nothing!! The people of New Orleans adopted the attitude that it was someone else's responsibility to take care of them. People grew up thinking it was normal to remain unemployed for extended periods of time and that they should just rely on the government to take care of every need that they had. When disaster struck they had not even done the basic things recommended for survival. The had not done these things for themselves or for each other.
Warned about hijacking plot--- There was never anything specific about these warnings. How they would gain control for example. That a prety important factor if you want to prevent a hijacking.
However by your apparent hatred of President Bush, I'm goona guess that you are pro-death.
2006-07-21 15:17:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by unicorn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1)It is not easy to get the death penalty.Those that do are a threat to life.
2) http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/history-of-stem-cell-research-faq.htm
This should clear things up for you.
3)Well I think the only way to deal with things in that region is to kill people.The world is a ruff place.
4)I don't think he is the Governor of New Orleans.That is who is responsible for New Orleans.Florida evacuates almost yearly.
5)Would you have believed someone was evil enough to do that?I didn't until I saw it.That is why we have to kill people in the Mid-East.They grow 'em like that.
Pro-life on all accounts.
2006-07-21 14:35:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have got to be kidding. Approves of death penalty- any common sense God fearing human should, Stem cell- yeah because they were getting the "material" from babies killed by their mothers, allows deaths in Iraq? How many deaths did Sadam allow in Iraq? Should we have not killed Germans and Japanese in WWII? I am sick of these questions. Just admit you hate Bush and are trying to set up a straw man to knock it down. Many others have tried and it fails. Why does everyone want to blame one man instead facing the fact we live in a fallen imperfect world and bad things happen.
2006-07-21 14:32:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by James S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pro-choice
2006-07-21 14:23:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by sabre6 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get off your soapbox!! He is a man of principle, and all his actions that you have knocked can be and are defensible. You throw around these so called facts as though you know what you are talking about. You don't!! You mix apples and oranges and try to win your argument by confusion. However, there are those among us who see through your fallacies!!
Chow!!
2006-07-21 14:35:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by No one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolute rubbish. Bush could be professional-existence and is professional-existence retaining unborn, ordering a reaction to an announcement of conflict against us, to reserve people to guard the country against people who've declared they choose to kill all people has not something to do with abortion, you won't be ready to combination the two it fairly is retarded.
2016-11-02 12:15:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by awad 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Carlin stated that republicans care a lot about sperm and eggs. They care about fetuses. When you're born, you're on your own. Can't get them to fund childcare, or day care. Not pro children, pro fetus.
When you turn 18, they care about you again. Taxes and military service. You are once again important.
2006-07-21 14:25:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Daijobu K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋