Americans
2006-07-21 11:55:00 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Both...the old supply and demand thing.
2006-07-21 11:57:51 · answer #1 · answered by shoppingcartgirl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both. If there was no market, there would be no trafficking. Trafficking creates a market.
The best thing is admit we've lost the war on drugs. Make them legal and use the monies saved for treatment and prevention. Imagine the crime we'd stop including cutting off a major part of terrorist funding.
2006-07-21 12:00:20 · answer #2 · answered by williegod 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What else would the hard working americans do to blow off steam in this country? Become alchoholics. Americans work harder, put more hours than any other country in the world. And we don't have enough put away for retirement. Hey it is wrong to use cause abuse leads to alot of negative things.
But let's say their were no illegal drugs, then we would be a country of Alchoholics. Cause other than alchohol I don't see anything else to cure people from the ills of human emotion. Don't say everyone is the same, that's why we live in the USA, to live free and make decisions on our own and not by some dictator (Melosevic, Hitler, Sadaam).
2006-07-21 12:22:43 · answer #3 · answered by JOHNNY D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't just blame one side. Though there is a supply and demand principle, it's not something you remove from the market if it dangers public health, like a product for consumption. Both sides need to cooperate to fight this dangerous product, since some people are just too stupid to realize the effects it has on them personally and in our society.
By the way, its not just Mexicans, it's other Latin American countries as well, let's not generalize, it's intellectually unhealthy.
2006-07-21 13:46:27 · answer #4 · answered by diehard0603 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mexicans are not the only ones trafficking, and americans are not the only ones consuming. But the consumer's to blame.
2006-07-21 11:58:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
via fact a gaggle of folk are all clamoring to guard the undesirable drug abusers from spending time in penal complex. I say do away with the call for, and the availability will circulate away. meaning putting each consumer in reformatory for an undisclosed quantity of time. while the jails top off, construct greater. seem at all the form workers and penal complex guards which will positioned to artwork. Get the purchasers to stop utilizing, via despite capacity mandatory, and those drug peddlers will now no longer have a client base.
2016-10-08 04:33:37 · answer #6 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both, of course. But the US government may also have made a mistake by declaring 'war on drugs' just like it did earlier in enacting Prohibition of alcohol. By criminalizing drugs instead of regulating them, a whole criminal economy has developed, drawing countles kids and adults into it.
2006-07-21 12:01:00 · answer #7 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
blame the consumers, if no one consumed drugs then there wouldn't be a need for suppliers. supply and demand. and besides there are many other countries contributing to the selling and buying of drugs.
2006-07-21 12:05:23 · answer #8 · answered by andy17mex 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The CIA for trafficking it to & from Vietnam during the war....
2006-07-21 11:59:11 · answer #9 · answered by kg1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's blame Coors for beer lovers...I get youre point! But its not a matter of blame its a matter of cutting off the source. AGAIN close the border
2006-07-21 11:57:51 · answer #10 · answered by tripledigit67 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Absolutely!!
2006-07-21 11:58:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋