When invaded by another country and your country has no real army or money for wepons, what are acceptable methods of defense? If the two armies are put head to head in conventional warfare you know you'd lose. Are Smart bombs, suicide bombs, shooting an accasional rocket ok? What is?
2006-07-21 06:42:02 · 7 answers · asked by Adam H 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No they are not.
There is no excuse for preferentially targeting civilians instead of legitimate military objectives.
Anybody who does this deserves to have his country invaded and a more civilized government established.
2006-07-21 07:57:51 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in this concern one ought to hotel to guerilla methods. technologically inferior forces can do not something to resign sensible bombs or guided rockets. rather they ought to hit and run. suicide bombers are the most useful approach considering there isn't any thanks to come back across or supply up them. they're hell bent on demise for inspite of reason so there isn't any negotiating with them. both kill them or they kill you. quite a lot something is going at that aspect. if the U. S. were invaded and we had their supplies, we may be doing an similar project truly. not suicide bombing yet guerilla methods. the most to triumphing this kind is to frustrate the enemy into giving up. not by skill of killing via sheer numbers. smash down the enemy's will to strive against by skill of hitting them even as they least assume and dealing away so that they won't be able to hearth lower back. you get to stay to inform the tale good even as the enemy is often on shelter.
2016-12-10 13:05:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The USA did not invade Iraq. We are enforcing int'l agreements through the use of force. Iraq agreed to follow certain UN mandates and didn't, so we and many other countries made them do what they were suppose to do. So goes with Hezbolah. Israel complied with their agreements, no one else did. The US and Israel are the good guys.
2006-07-21 07:00:11 · answer #3 · answered by Richard B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do agree with the answer of "NIKKI W"..
What is alternative to this ? To let them occupy our countries or what ?
Another point -For the USA invasion of Iraq-:
For what USA only is making the resolutions of security council active ?
Why many resolutions against "Israel" from UN-general assembly or sec. council not activated ?!
2006-07-21 07:12:51 · answer #4 · answered by mustafa63gar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People will do whatever is necessary to defend the country, their loved ones and their ideals.
2006-07-21 06:46:40 · answer #5 · answered by Nikki W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
arent we doing this in the middle east now
2006-07-21 06:45:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All is fair in love and war.
2006-07-21 06:45:51 · answer #7 · answered by Baelor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋