Should we have bombed Saudi Arabia after Sept 11th?

Question

Considering 15 out of 19 were Saudies.

Answer 1

So?

Was the attack launched from Saudi Arabia? Was Saudi Arabia harboring people implicated in the attack? Would attacking Saudi Arabia have eliminated any Al Quaeda facilities?

Did you think about this at all?

Answer 2

If you accept the American way of doing things, i.e., that the proper response is to go and bomb something or someone, then bombing Saudi Arabia would have been more understandable than bombing Iraq. Iraq had nothing to do with "9/11" whilst, as you rightly say, most of the Twin Towers Terrorists were Saudis.

Answer 3

I am an Arabian Muslim and I do not, together with the majority of my people, approve of killing innocent people whether they were Muslims, Christians, Jews or whatsoever. But, you know what, I think it's typical of the American Arrogance to talk about bombing other countries and nations as if it were a piece of cake, or an interesting American movie. Besides, do u really think that the Muslims planned for this whole thing on their own?!! Seems both funny and absurd, doesn't it? It sounds logic that those who planned for the attack are those who benefited after it? And things have not been going very well for us? We're not the ones occupying other countries, getting use of their resources, and humiliating their peoples, right?

Answer 4

Jeezus, guy. you may positioned the cart AFTER the horse with your question and ask what the hell is so particular concerning to the U. S. that Iran, Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia might choose to attack US. Then, and in straightforward terms then, will your question be spoke back. (For those of you in Rio Linda, the literal answer to the question as to why we'd choose to attack those worldwide places is to PRE-EMPT, HEAD OFF AND/OR stop assaults against US in the previous yet another 9/11 happens.) EDIT: once you're "denomding" the certainty, nicely, right here that's. Thirty years in the past, in 1978, the Shah of Iran became into being overthrown via some wacky bearded fellow via the call of Khomeini, and Carter became into doing no longer something approximately U.S. hostages being held there. If issues had long previous my way, your uncle's e book might have study "The U.S. HAS ALREADY invaded Iran, and collapsed them like a rotten soccer." As for something of those places, the lot who have been drawing paychecks from the CIA understood how risky they have been to the U. S., yet President Carter the two did no longer pay attention to them or could no longer understood a notice they reported via fact HE HAD PEANUTS IN HIS EARS. There. You "Denomded" the certainty and that i gave it to you.

Answer 5

Don't be silly,they sell us oil so few bomb's are okay !!!! Look man their so rich they own the politician's they give such generous gift's to-they're friend's not bad Arabs,you know the ones that don't do as their told and aren't afraid of the s*it we'll give them if they don't tow the line,why we'll support a radical group in their own country to s*it them up on our behalf (secretly of course) No thems good injuns they're rich so they must be!!! Besides they got big weapon's and their own oil and won't give us a proper excuse any way-We'll propably have to use the British Colonial method and blow up both their shrines and let them kill each other,then take over by helping them,why change now-if it ain't broken don't fix it !!!ktf.x

Answer 6

Saudi Arabia's despot regime is one of the strongest US allies after Israel in the region. How about putting a rocket in your @** ??? Then we can tell how it feels from the expression on your face during delivery.

Answer 7

No. There are factions of the Muslim community throughout the Middle East that are Radical and extreme. They are not in power in Saudi Arabia. They ARE in power in Iran. That's where the bigger threat looms in my opinion.

Answer 8

They were X Saudis ,no.The government has always supported the USA!!!! David P is ignorant.

Answer 9

The Saudis are hiding Osama "Dingbat" Ladin

Answer 10

If you want to be responsible for starting WW 3 and be without oil, sure.