"The More outrageous the terrorist act committed on the people by the Government the less likely the people will think the government was involved." Adolf Hitler
2006-07-21
00:42:57
·
21 answers
·
asked by
theforce51
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
Go to video.google.com and type in 911 in the search engine and get the truth.
2006-07-21
00:48:22 ·
update #1
Great Ceasars you should pull your head out of your *** and watch the documentaries.
2006-07-21
01:06:06 ·
update #2
Rachel R S The Jews control the world media so you will have to dig for the truth,watch the 911 videos or are you frightened?
2006-07-21
01:22:16 ·
update #3
Great Ceasars;Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Michael Moore is a putz,Try listening to Alex Jones and Morgan ReynoldsOr even David Shayler the ex M1-5 agent.
2006-07-21
05:48:27 ·
update #4
Grandpa Prescott Bush was Hitler's banker, wasn't he?
2006-07-21 00:50:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Are you trying to say that Bush was behind 9/11?
With all due respect, it's claims like that that are giving liberals a bad name... and I'm a liberal. I don't agree with most of the guy's policies and I don't like a lot of the things that he's done, but inferring that he orchestrated what happened on September 11 is ridiculous. It boggles my mind that people from both sides of the political spectrum can't even agree on that...
Edit: So, buddy, in other words, you watched an *Internet documentary* and came to the conclusion that the President committed what would be one of the worst crimes in recent memory. What politicans or prominent people support that theory? Well, none, but the Internet documentary says it, so it must be true, right? I don't even think Michael Moore went so far as to say Bush was BEHIND 9/11. (I might be wrong on that, but it doesn't matter even if he did, because it's BS regardless.)
In conclusion: You're full of it. I'm ashamed to share the same political wing as you. Move over as far left as you can; I don't want to be near you.
Edit #2: The link I posted below pretty much debunks all of the claims in Loose Change. Whether or not you choose to read it is up to you, but if you just skim through it you'll start to see why, like I said, not even the most liberal politicans support your claims. And don't even tell me that it's "too long," since you just watched a damn ninety minute documentary (which I've seen start-to-finish, by the way) and apparently listened to every word. The reason I give you this link is because explaining all the BS in that movie myself would take a couple thousand pages.
But if you're stupid enough to continue believing such a ridiculous theory, then be my guest. Just don't wonder why most people will turn you off immediately once you start rambling about your bogus "conspiracy theories."
2006-07-21 00:51:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very regrettably, he's my President. i did not vote for him both time, yet he received the Electoral college (albeit, lower than very questionable circumstances...Florida/2000 & Ohio/2004). Very regrettably also, is the undeniable reality that in case you disagree with the administration, you're tagged as being an unloyal American. including his operating mate, they're both oilmen. Does this let us know some thing about gas prices? about the billions made by technique of Haliburton in Iraq? about why we are paying for Iraq's oil to keep our forces mobilized. (in the journey that they pick us there, why are not they imparting the troops with oil, and our position of start with oil to assist pay off us for our "good deed"?) Do you imagine he's dry? it is glaring to me that he has climbed decrease back into the bottle. he's an embarassment, at living house and distant places. Take any length for the lots... salary vs. value of living? p.c. of taxes paid by technique of the wealthy? health care spending? dealing with failures? providing for disabled veterans? college loans/assistance? Decline of extreme paying production unit jobs? Outsourcing? skills of his appointees? it is Nixon all yet all over again, with the inevitable pardons contained in the accurate. Cheney departs/Rice assumes Vice Presidency. Bush will be lengthy gone before 2009. Rice assumes Presidency, and subject matters mass pardons in 2009. Sound accepted? Impeachment(s) are contained in the works. And, this may don't have from now on some thing to do with a pair's top to have an open marriage, as became given as a reason behind the perfect impeachment proceding. A **** and a Bush. Does this say some thing about screwing the individuals?
2016-12-02 01:14:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by hashrat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In more than one way. look at how he has trampled our rights to privacy. In the name of the common good. If terrorists want to hurt us they will do it weather Bush has wire taps or unlawful search warrants on his own citizens or not. Also getting his people into war under false pretenses. My God he has sent American servicemen to die while lying to the population about why. He should be impeached. I sadly voted for him the first time. Who ever did the second should be crying now.
2006-07-21 02:05:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
DID YOU STUDY HISTORY?
Did you take some your precious time to understand what the Nazis did? And Did you see what the Neo-Nazis did in America? They burned churches for example. In South America, besides burning Synagogues, stabbing Jewish students, desecrating Jewish cemeteries, they are training PLO, Hammass, Islamic Jihad in their "military" camps, thus preparing the next generation of terrorists to attack the civilized world.
PLEASE DO YOUR HOME WORK
2006-07-21 01:12:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Radio Girl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lessee now....
Support a large national welfare system?
Support a large national health care system?
Support harsh & strict controls of business, commerce and employment?
Support outlawing the private ownership of firearms?
Support identification of a races in order to give a race advantage over other races?
Support stifling, silencing or outlawing any dialogue diametrically opposed to certain viewpoints?
Sure doesn't sound like Bush.
But it does sound familiar!
It's the basis for the National Socialist Party. (In Germany they called them NAZIs.)
2006-07-21 13:55:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First Bush has to know the definition of Nazi. I think he was snorting coke when they covered that one in high school and collage. So the answer is probably no.
2006-07-21 00:53:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
C'mon, George W. has never read a book harder than Where's Waldo, never mind Mien Kampf. I don't think he could be a Nazi even if he wanted to.
2006-07-21 00:48:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by great gig in the sky 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to take some history classes at your local college.
2006-07-21 00:50:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by daveinsurprise 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
he is their father,
nazis only killed people in one area one nation hum BUSH killed people in Iraq, and people are still dieing there ,
he raided Afghanistan and shaked the foundations of the country, he is supporting Israel to kill people in Palestine and Lubnan>
he is the most ruthless and cruel man of the history of humanity.
he is devil.
May Allah kill him
2006-07-21 01:51:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by sighhhhhhhhhh 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No George Bush is not a Nazi. You however are an idiot.
2006-07-21 00:48:47
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋