One man's suicide pilot is another man's divine wind....
One man's insurgent is another man's revolutionist...
One man's patriot is another man's traitor....
2006-07-21 21:23:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're a dumb a$$! You'd eat s#*t if these cowardly b*st*rds told too! Any man that would hide behind a child, use a school to hide in, bomb a school bus, or hide behind a woman is a piece of s#*t not a man!
You dumb Frs should have a backbone and stop being whiny, weenie, cowardly, good for nothing b*st*rds! We beat the biggest military in the world to build our country. You don't have 1/10 that size problem.
Shoot the cowardly terrorists. If they were in the US, we would shoot them whenever and wherever they stuck their head up! No terrorists could survive doing that kind of crap in my neighborhood! If I had to do it all by myself I'd shoot them all!
2006-07-21 07:47:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Terrorists can not be Hero. Nope, Never! Killing innocent people does not make any sense. Heroes fight for good causes or on certain principles.
How one can justify the acts of terrorists?
2006-07-21 05:59:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kakaz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would agree with the statement that you have here. So those who try to attack the US soldiers in Iraq are going after a military target and in their situation I mite do the same. But those who attack civilians (more so when they are your countrymen) are disgraceful.
2006-07-21 06:08:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by MP US Army 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with Philip. What kind of cowards kill and kidnap people then run and hide behind the skirts of old women and small children and then cry when they get bombed? Hesbollah, that's what kind.
2006-07-21 06:00:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's not true. It's probably better to say "someone's terrorist is another terrorist's (or potential terrorist's) hero".
2006-07-21 05:59:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by puppy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought the expression was "One mans freedom fighter is another's terrorist".
I'd say it was pretty true!
2006-07-21 06:03:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Big E 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must first define the word (terrorist) very accurately before you use it, because the word (terrorist) is used very often, and even misused by many internanational media.
2006-07-21 05:58:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say "Why support the terrorists that use you as a human shield?"
Instead, kick them out. Be free, eat well, live happily.
2006-07-21 05:56:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sadly, yes.
2006-07-21 05:57:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gungnir 5
·
0⤊
0⤋