English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-20 17:11:08 · 19 answers · asked by shawnluger1 2 in Politics & Government Military

19 answers

Sadly, I don't think WW3 will have a 'winning side'.

2006-07-20 17:14:42 · answer #1 · answered by sincityq 5 · 0 0

In WW3 there will be no winning side. The prelude to the actual war will be years of strife and genacide and what at the time seems to be major wars all over the globe. Then some power that thinks that it can dictate the will of god will push the button and start the mechine and then 30 to 45 minnits later there will be no nation on the entire plannit that will be able to survive as a power.
The war may and probebly will leave survivors that may rebuild what was destroyed in the short time of the 3rd and last world war but it will take time...

2006-07-20 17:48:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WW3 will destroy the whole world because everyones got bombs and as soon as we start using them on a country theyll bomb us back and then we'll destroy the earth. the only way to avoid it would be to act first and strike so hard that they will not be able to attack us back, but that wont happen. the whole concept of humans destroying their whole race would be unlikely if it wasnt for the fact that in some countries one person is holding so much power. So I think yeah the world will end and there will be few if any survivors if we have a leader crazy enough to launch nuclear attacks. Kim Jong Il?

2006-07-20 17:25:26 · answer #3 · answered by SoREAL 2 · 0 0

Ohh sure America could "win" an all out World War III. But the consequence would be that World War IV would be fought with sticks and stones.

2006-07-20 17:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by InnerCircle 4 · 0 0

Since when does a side win. You may think of a war having two sides, but each side has sides of its own.

No one wins a war. If anything, the winner is the one with the least damage.

2006-07-20 17:15:05 · answer #5 · answered by lightning_bug_x 2 · 0 0

Absolutely!

2006-07-20 17:17:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

which isn't plausible then why to communicate about. 0.5 of the united states's inhabitants is having british blood. except WWW3 starts and Britishers bypass antagonistic to united states. then may nicely be united states will win.

2016-10-15 00:56:08 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No the world is becoming stronger everyday but america is finding it hard to keep up

2006-07-21 07:21:08 · answer #8 · answered by HHH 6 · 0 0

WW3..who said this was WW3?

2006-07-20 17:14:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. China. If you read, you would have known by now that China probably has the biggest army right now.

2006-07-20 17:42:24 · answer #10 · answered by Ohay 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers