Nothing has or is evolving from one specie to another.
2006-07-20 12:22:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by beek 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolution I'm not sure about but Big Bang Theory is more scientific. What I find interesting that most people are not willing to consider is that both accounts may be correct. You have to read it with an open mind willing to try to understand what the Bible is saying. The creation story in the Bible has a history of being mystical. It is very difficult to understand it when it is read as a fairytale. Until recent years there was no evidence that could possibly have supported the Bible story of creation. Most people read the story in Genesis and take the words for the literal meaning that we have for them today. Such as the word "Day". We call a Day a 24 hour period but it actually means a creative period. You can say that I am twisting things but I guess you would have to understand Hebrew to know what I am talking about. Also In the beginning there was no Earth and darkness was everywhere. Says so in the Bible and Big Bang Theory. The sequence of events that happen in the Bible and Big Bang Theory are in the same order. So what the Bible says came First, Second, Third etc. is also in the same order of events predicted by the theories presented to us in the Big Bang account. This even goes for the creation or formation of life. The less advanced were created first and the most advanced were created later with the last life form created being Man. The evidence is in things not seen. We call it faith. However, science in my opinion will continue to uncover the truth that is in the Bible. Don't knock my belief in what I have said before first reading what I'm talking about.
2006-07-20 12:36:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So many evidences that I can't find any. There are millions of strong evidence that prove that evolution is not possible. The Bible is not a book meant to prove creation.
2006-07-20 12:24:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Flaco 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
EVOLUTION
The introduction to Genesis and to the whole Bible ascribes everything to the living God, creating, making, acting, moving, and speaking. There is no room for evolution without a flat denial of Divine revelation. One must be true the other false. All of God’s works are good, great, wondrous, and perfect.
Man starts from nothing. He begins in helplessness, ignorance, and inexperience. All his works, therefore, proceed on the principle of evolution. This principle is only seen in human affairs: from the hut to the palace; from the canoe to the ocean liner; from the spade to the plowshare to machines. But the birds build their nests today as at the beginning. There is growth and development within man, but no passing, change, or evolution out from one into another.
For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be evident stages of evolution today. You would be able to find species in many stages of evolution in nature right now. For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be no God. And that’s exactly what evolutionists believe and are trying prove. The evolutionist bases his or her conclusions on human assumptions and reasoning, instead of on the documentary evidence of the manuscripts.
2006-07-20 12:20:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that God created upon this earth PRIOR TO Genesis 1:1-31, 2:1-3.
I believe God destroyed all prior creation (Gen.1:2) to bring forth man created in God's likeness (Gen.1:26), with an UNBROKEN lineage beginning with Adam.
Pat (ndbpsa ©)
2006-07-20 16:10:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by BibleProphecyOnTheWeb 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
PROHPECY> The Bible has over 2000 prophecies fullfilled others yet to be!! Men can't prophecize, but God inpires them to> Israel regained statehood in 1948 after over 2000 years of Jews in exile! God promised to give the Jews their land back in the prophet Ezekiel.read his book in the Bible.
2006-07-20 12:19:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by esero26 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
monkeys are ugly. good argument.
chimpanzees are not monkeys. they are apes. they are primates. we are primates.
it was a rather extensive process, which is why we are not thier twins.
i don't understand why everyone thinks the argument is because "we saw a resemblence between man and ape"
there are thousand of bones and skull fragments of creatures similar to us. and different from each other
dang it- to the girl who asked about what animals have changed-
have you ever seen a wild cow?
they were mighty differnt way back when.
also- ask me about corn sometime
2006-07-20 12:22:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by lyleaux 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is a farce, a man's assuption because he saw a similarity between man and ape. There is no solid proof other than in your mind because Satan dwells there.
2006-07-20 12:20:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution shos me
in all the years that mankind has been on earth what animal has changed?
2006-07-20 12:23:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by godsnoriel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you give me 10 of those STRONG EVIDENCE ARGUMENTS? I doubt it. I prefer to believe in "intelligent design."
2006-07-20 12:36:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by oph_chad 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am afraid, I'd never be able to list everything in the space provided, so instead, ill give you links to places where you can get the answer.
2006-07-20 12:30:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by acaykath 3
·
0⤊
0⤋