So does that mean for our planet to experience perfect peace we need a global president who is an athiest, differently abled, female of colour?
2006-07-21 04:40:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dark Light 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
What are you saying?! That christians are the cause of nuclear warfare or something?! That is just soemthing else. The nerve of you buttheads. Um, the last time I checked, christians FOLLOW the 10 Commandments. And isn't "Thou shalt not kill" one of the commandments? So, why would christians be at fault for causing such atrosity. Why would you suggest that? I think it's the atheist retards out there that start the crap of today. They have no problem killing people, except for maybe a guilty conscience, and a one-way trip to jail.
God Bless You, Jerk.
2006-07-20 11:01:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by x 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No atheist huh? Well if there were no atheist then there probably wouldn't be nuclear weapons so therefore no atheist to protect us from nuclear warfare wouldn't be a problem and besides don't you think religious like us know how to handle those situations?
2006-07-20 11:06:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by AtcyJAC 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It received't ensue in my lifetime or yours. Why are y'multi functional of those hurry to tutor bibel maximum ideal? it isn't any longer some thing yet a mass of contradictions ... Following are purely TEN from a itemizing of over four hundred. "what number adult males did the authorities of David's captains kill? became Abraham justified by technique of religion or by technique of works? what number sons did Abraham have? became Abiathar the daddy or the son of Ahimelech? Who became Abijam's mom? How were Abijam and Asa appropriate? How lengthy became the ark of the covenant at Abinadab's living house? How previous became Abram even as Ishmael became born? what number sons did Absalom have? even as did Absalom revolt adverse to David?" each and each and every of those has a minimum of two conflicting solutions. analyze them on the link lower than. ""in spite of the indisputable fact that it truly is a sparkling prophesy" you could make some thing fit AFTER the reality. human beings were prophesying biblical stuff for 2000 years. ~
2016-12-02 00:33:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The whole world would die... from having no existance of god to argue about. They would go into more controversy over who's god is the right god, and having no one to give them the sense, would have the world in chaos. I believe Athesists keep the peace and are helping the world into a more senseful state.
2006-07-20 15:44:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥-=-TLCNJ19-=-♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I truly wonder what is in the purvue of athiests, that could have any influence on the creation of prevention of a nuclear war?
2006-07-20 11:04:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't understand your question... I don' think that Atheists are the only ones protecting the world from nukes
2006-07-20 11:02:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well there's Jerry Springer and then ther's EINSTIEN and then there's ADOLF HITLER and then there's jerry lewis.and then there's.....in other words there is a great variety of different personallities in this world and 'you' and 'your' thoughts are just one of many.....but there is this....whenever a person is WRONG or RIGHT the fruit thereof will BEAR him/her 'out' in the end....( GOOD or BAD )....
2006-07-20 11:03:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by BILL P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What would happen if Bill Clinton was not around to protect an all girls school?
2006-07-20 11:24:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by davidvario 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No offense, but are you EVER going to quit asking atheists questions? Isn't this the 12th one?
2006-07-20 10:59:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋