I can see the argument from some that this would be an invasion of our privacy rights, but on the other hand I think it's a great idea. It would lead to the solving of a lot more crimes since the DNA could be easily searched.
Personally, I don't plan to commit any crimes, so I have no fears of getting arrested as a result of this database.
2006-07-20 18:05:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mama Pastafarian 7
·
7⤊
2⤋
Although I have nothing to hide, being a law-abiding citizen, I would be concerned about the information getting into the wrong hands ... very possible as computer databases are never 100% secure. I also don't trust the Government (whoever is in power). Paranoid? Possibly.
The security issue is ultimately my main concern.
2006-07-20 10:33:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by DeeBee 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to pass on that one because that seems very strange and a tad bit scary to have your DNA in a national registry. I think that the government has already invaded American's privacy more than enough so this is just ridiculous if it were to ever actually happen.
2006-07-20 10:44:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by rodaerc06 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope...I don't want to give up my DNA for a national database. Besides, if they did force everyone to submit a sample, they would have too much data and using DNA as a investigational tool would be useless.
2006-07-20 10:44:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chainsawmom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends on what type of lifestyle I was living. If I was a criminal or sex offender, than no, because then I know if I reoffend, then my DNA will be stored and my capture eminent. But me, sure. If I was killed or kidnapped, I'd be helpful to have my DNA on file so that the perp could be apprehended. No, I am not criminally minded, and NO, I don't watch too much CSI... my profession leads me down this path.
2006-07-20 10:26:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by ladylaw_912 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would probably be a good thing..especially if there was a massive disaster like the Oklahoma City bombing or like 9/11. It would be a sad reason....but, it would speed up the identifying of remains.
The more I think about it, the better it sounds. Yeah, I'd be fine with it.
2006-07-20 19:36:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by scruffycat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I understand about having convicted criminals do it but surely it is an invasion of privacy for others. It's going to be of similar debate to the national ID cards. There is no need for it and it would be a bad thing in the short and long term.
2006-07-20 10:26:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Evil J.Twin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although I see little real evidence to suggest innocent citizens should currently fear our government, there is no guarantee that one day an organisation will not come to power that really shouldn't have that much power.
If Britain and America can re-elect Bush and Blair then anything is possible.
2006-07-20 10:48:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Warrior Hamster 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is part of the Republican version of Freedom???? Very Orwellian, wouldn't you say?
I am also suspect of the bigger agenda of the Amber Alert system. If it works so well for the protection of children, they can eventually convince us to report people who disagree with the government.
2006-07-20 10:28:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When I used to fly the airlines, I would find my luggage (tools) untouched, but my electric razor taken apart. Do you think they have already taken DNA in ways like this?
2006-07-20 10:27:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋