Noahs Arc, True or False?

Question

Archeoligist, Ron Wyatt some years ago with a big team of sceintists and his 2 sons discoverd what they thought to be Noahs Ark, according to the IJournalist who kept record of the two sons and what they had done and said etc... after they arrived in the country they spent the day in a tent and made one big pray for God to have the taxi stall wearever to look because according to one person he said :" we were clueless of where to look" all they were basing on t heir search was the moutain wear it it says in the bible wear Noah spent 40 days and nights. after that night the two sons went lookin in a taxi it stalled and they placed a rock in places the taxi stalled they searched in the places they marked in each place they found magnificient things including a ship formation on top of the moutain that looked like wood that turned into petrified rock. and they looked in the bible to see how long God said the bible was the measured the formations and it was exact.

and they also found these stones with 7 crosses on them.. and a in cave that looked like someone carved into for shelter and fence like in caves that looked like fences.. and the carbon date was thousands of years old. during Noahs time.

Also I have Learned the alot of disbeleving sceintists cant make up their mind, several years ago it was aired of cbs or somethin that it has been prooven thatthe earth was once flooded completely now days they say it wasnt its impossible well ther archs are sayin it.. so I have found sceience is unrealible

and Their has been so many biblical discoveries that dont change but all this other sceince whoohaa keeps changing..

10 years ago they were sayin the earth was 500 billions years old that changes every year,

Answer 1

yes the found it in turkey on mount Ararat. believe man its true. trust in God and he will not fail you.

Answer 2

Yes, science is learning, and if you disagree, then prove the earth flat. Ark false: The boat would have had to have been so big it could not have been built, it would have been so big that it could not have sailed, one man in 20 lifetimes could not have gotten all of those animals and could not have gotten to the other continents for those animals if he did have help, 2 of each species is no enough DNA for the species to go on, the earth possibly was covered by water when it was still a molten goop at the surface and most scientists know that that is even BS, last the story is too ridiculous, comes from a book of fairy tails, and the myth would require god to exist which is BS. The ship would have had to been older to petrify, and they probably found magnetic rock that would stall the taxi. Most likely, the people made it up to look good, but nice try.

Answer 3

Noah had an ark and it is described in the Bible and yes it is true.The Bible cannot be proved wrong even if you try.Anything else changes but what God put in His Word cannot change for God is not human and He cannot lie.I have answered a similar question previously and in that question I said that our calender cannot work if the events of the Bible is not taken into account.At one stage it is described in the Bible how God made the sun stand still while a battle raged until the Israelites had one the battle.If those hours are not figured in the calender wont work.I dare anyone on this earth to prove the Bible wrong.It cannot be done.

Answer 4

Ron Wyatt also claimed to have found:

- The tomb of Noah and his wife
- Sodom and Gomorrah
- The Red Sea crossing
- The exact location of the burning bush
- The Ark of the Covenant
- The stones of the 10 commandments
- The exact location of the crucifixion of Jesus

...yet no-one else has been able to confirm these amazing "discoveries".

The 'ark' Ron Wyatt found is a natural rock formation. The rocks are all indigenous rocks to the area, not petrified wood. The anchor stones he claimed were used to maintain equilibrium are found all over the region and are ancient religious artifacts.

Answer 5

The Ark is real, better evidence lies in the fossil evidense, the geological column laid down at the time of the flood. The ice age follwoing the flood. The cultural memories of the flood in about 162 places in the world... all better arguments

I likes his ark video at first and then bought a book that analyzed his claims and it pointed out there are no bones in the titanic which is in cold waters less than a cetury ago, but he claimed the bones of the egyptian army wer in like tens of feet of water but he couldnt bring other to see them they had to take his word... so I have to say it sounds not credible

Frankly, I liked Ron Wyatts video on the so called ark discovery at first and when I looked into it closer I really got a problem with his so called claims and 'discoveries' For one thing he is not and was not a licensed archeologist as you claim and I think his credentials are embellished. He did a lot of strange things with fewer and fewer witnesses until it was only him, claiming he found bones of the egyptians strewn in the red sea and the ark of the covenant right under where Jesus died... sadly he got more and more bizare in the claims and each time had fewer and fewer eyewitnesses. He promised to show the world the ark and died of canser before he did.... It was also a little sad to see in his videos how other people were misquoted and I think the guy had problems to be honest he needed more people around him to give him good feedback and loving critisism instead of letting him veer off into eccentric weird unsubstantiated claims with no witnesses. In the end the some experts initially liked the ark site but decided it was a rare but natural geologyical thing and disagreed with Ron and the video appeared to incorrectly quote them and it makes me more suspicious of how Ron Wyatt evaluated evidense to be honest.

Answer 6

Evidence can be planted. Police(Law folk) do it often. So it is said in which things are an "allegory" and a "mystery" (not to be taken literally) tares (lies) are also sown. So believe not every spirit; nor every wind blowin, tossing unlearned children this way and that. If you want to know what's really "evident" from all the biblical and historical evidence, it's "that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God(Grace)". And if Jesus wasn't, what makes any think they are?

As for the Noah's Ark story, the allegoric POINT being made is that old Noah did both all God commanded and all the LORD commanded, which are as contrary as 2 and 7, as contrary as mercy and sacrifice, as contrary as grace and law. And where did doing both grace and law get old Noah? Inducted in a hall of shame: "these all died" and "received not the promise" (Heb 11).

The "grace" of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Answer 7

This story that you speak of is one of many. Every few years we all hear more and more stories of somebody who supposedly knows where Noah's Ark is or who had found it and then forgotten its exact location. Of course all of these stories cannot be correct.

I'm working on research for a book that I'm planning on writing very soon about Noah's ark and how it is actually a legend/myth. First of all, scientists don't believe that it is at all probable for a worldwide flood to occur. There are a few "flood geologists" out there who aren't objective enough to be considered actual scientists--instead, the start with the "truth" of Genesis and work to prove it correct. Most scientists think of flood geology as religiously motivated pseudoscience.

If you have any specific questions about Noah's Ark or simply want to discuss it further, send me a message. Hope that helped.

Answer 8

Sure, a boat or something was found. Crosses would have been irrelevant at that time since it was BC, but hey, OF course it happened. We have been taught by secular humanist institutions to discount any story from the Bible outright, but our force of snide cynicism doesn't change whether it happened or not. Every myth does indeed have some truth to it, for instance the myth of evolution is true in all its fundamental points, but when you put those points in action you find yourself in a land with leprechauns and unicorns and
Abiogenesis. Leprechauns and unicorns are more likely than Abiogenesis, but at least Abio... satisfies our prerequisits of only accepting a godless universe so it MUST be true.

Answer 9

Every couple of years, someone claims to have found the ark, and it always turns out to be a hoax. This is no different.

If I want an entertaining story about someone finding a biblical ark (even if it's a different one), I'll rent "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark."

Answer 10

as a christian and amateur scientist, i have to ask whether the ark would have surrvived after the flood waters subsided....

in otherwords, if all of the wood (trees) were still underwater and then would also be waterlogged, how could the family of noah leave the ark intact.

instead, it was probably used to create pens for the herd animals, build walls and roofs for them to live in, and even smaller boats when the children left the nest.

it would not make sense to leave the ark intact. perhaps still around in pieces, but i imagine the pieces would barely resemble the ark as it were.

-eagle

Answer 11

You wrote this:
and they also found these stones with 7 crosses on them.. and a in cave that looked like someone carved into for shelter and fence like in caves that looked like fences.. and the carbon date was thousands of years old. during Noahs time.

Jesus was 3000 years after Noah, so why would there be crosses there?