English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He believes God gave his people America and that they are the rightful owners!

2006-07-20 09:00:44 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

not cool! messiah means anointed! idiot!

2006-07-20 09:14:58 · update #1

7 answers

He is a freedom fighter to those who share his views and ally with him, while he is a terrorist to those who have different views and inevitably conflict with him. Such is the case in all similar occurrences. Both sides may also spread propaganda either promoting or demoting the freedom fighter/terrorist. It's subjective.
The same applies to Americans, Arabs, Israelis, Persians, etc.

2006-07-20 09:05:14 · answer #1 · answered by Captain Hero 4 · 1 1

From American History, of which I am a great fan, it is my belief that the Early American Native was a very spiritual people, no matter what tribe. True, their relighinon was not quite the same as ours, but the basic principle was. They believed in an after-life. They actually had many beliefs that can be found in our Bible.

2006-07-20 09:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by stullerrl 5 · 0 0

Messiah comes from Jews you idiot and not Native Americans. You are a horrible person for asking this question.

2006-07-20 09:05:55 · answer #3 · answered by geewhizbaby2008 3 · 0 0

seeing that all and sundry belonged to a recognizable tribe or united states of america... and they fought antagonistic to an invading protection rigidity subsidized by using a authorities depending in a separate territory.... And for the most section the significant battles were fought as large prepared calvary or gentle infantry gadgets going head-to-head antagonistic to different similar gadgets of their enemies... They were enemy opponents interior the provider of opposing forces. squaddies. abnormal troops the way we view such issues at present, yet squaddies interior the provider of their united states of america none the a lot less. some thing to be happy with in case you question me. no longer the man combatant's fault that they lost. even as sturdy squaddies lose a war it truly is often the fault of the political command structure, in both a strategic or operational failure. the U. S. has had a lot adventure with similar events. both "A" or "B" determination gadgets not often get smart responses. want an party? have you ever finally stopped beating your spouse? convinced or no?

2016-11-24 23:03:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How powerful is he? Let's stop being naive. To the victor goes the spoils! If he won, he'd be a liberator to the new nation. If he lost...terrorist.

2006-07-20 09:04:51 · answer #5 · answered by bigtony615 4 · 0 0

what's the difference? osama Ben laden was called a freedom fighter by Bush Senior in war against the soviet union.

2006-07-20 09:05:47 · answer #6 · answered by nibbana 2 · 0 0

depends what side you are on. The two phrases mean the same thing

2006-07-20 09:04:05 · answer #7 · answered by alchemthis 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers