2006-07-20 08:19:40 · 13 answers · asked by Kenny ♣ 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If you believe in the big bang and God, you believe in Intelligent Design, not Creationism, there is a difference.
2006-07-20 08:51:14 · update #1
None whatsoever.
Everytime a creationist brings up "evidence" for a young earth, it is easily refuted or the lie pointed out. They tend to leave soon afterwards.
2006-07-20 08:23:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This question shows a common misunderstanding. Both sides of this debate all share the same evidence. The question then becomes, how is that evidence interpreted. We all look at the same dinosaur bones in the ground and come to different conclusions based upon critical thought and belief systems.
If you are truly interested, you may check out the following link for how creationists interpret the evidence. You will be shocked as to the overwhelming scientific research that seems to indicate a young earth position.
LINK: www.answersingenesis.org
Grace and peace to you.
2006-07-20 08:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there is. Granted no hard evidence, but evolution does not have any hard evidence either. To be perfectly honest, the evidence for creationsim and a young Earth is much more believable when looked at critically than the evidence for evolution and an old earth.
2006-07-20 08:24:12 · answer #3 · answered by Icy U 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No that came from one verse in the Bible, a day to God is like a thousand years to us. Since the Bible tells us there is no concept of time in Heaven, why do we keep doing this? God deals with eternity we deal with days, hours, minutes and seconds. It is like everyone saying that the end of the world is coming soon. Jesus said, NO MAN knows the hour except the Father in Heaven. Jesus gave the signs of the last days.
2006-07-20 08:28:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not that i know of. not all creationists believe in the 6000 year-old universe idea. i am a die-hard creationist who also believes the big bang theory can pretty much describe how it happened.... and by the way, the big bang and some parts of the theory of evolution mesh pretty well with some interpretations of genesis.
2006-07-20 08:23:08 · answer #5 · answered by Janci 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're waiting to modern each and each and every of the information you want, in spite of the indisputable fact that it is going to fall on deaf ears. Creationists placed each and each and every of the geology, strata, fossils, Grand Canyons, each and each and every of how right down to the flood. It grew to change into over each and each and every little ingredient, destroyed maximum existence (fossils) and pushed up the mountains. in case you argue that it quite is actual no longer plausible interior the 6000 365 days time body, or no longer plausible for a unmarried flood journey, they're going to quite come decrease decrease back with the “God can do some thing” bit. likely the perfect ideas geologist have is taking the geological extreme – Everest. The summit of Everest is produced from limestone that replaced into formed from the shells of trillions of ocean creatures. For a flood journey to push up the sea mattress to quite about 9 km above sea element, it may ought to wish to were a gargantuan cataclysmic journey. Tsunamis many kilometers extreme may have raged around the section, and from each and each and every of the distinct mountain stages being pushed up on the similar time. this doesn't in many circumstances be solid crusing circumstances for Noahs timber boat, may it? yet even then, the creationists may argue that God protect Noah’s ark from the mayhem, which may make actual each and every individual ask your self why he stricken to get Noah to construct an ark interior the first position. yet they could say “to attempt his faith”. Can’t win, I’m afraid. We only ought to wish to bypass over about them.
2016-12-02 00:18:58 · answer #6 · answered by nourse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most serious Christians believe the world is millions of years old and it was still created by God. It's sad people listen to protestant/envangelical creationists. They don't represent Christianity.
2006-07-20 08:24:44 · answer #7 · answered by enigma21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None , of course. Just about as valid as the earth being on the back of a turtle.
2006-07-20 08:23:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is some, but most scientists feel that its miniscule in comparision with the evidence to the contrary.
2006-07-20 08:22:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, quite a bit actually. I would suggest going to www.answersingenesis.com or www.ICR.com as the evidence would be too long to state here.
2006-07-20 08:24:24 · answer #10 · answered by BrotherMichael 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋